Critical Phenomenology: Borderline Between Grey, Opaque and Non-Transparent Zones – Permanent Transitional Times

Miško Šuvaković


In what follows, I will point to theorisations of diagramatic modular models of the human, social and cultural practices that relate to antagonistic and certainly turbulent processing of production and reproduction, political economy, real life, and forms of life in the field of contemporary non-transparent or gray sociality. My main thesis is that the transition has not been completed and that we are now in the midst of transition changes throughout the world – that contemporary media and art fictionalizes or defictionalizes our human condition. My intent in this article is to point to the modular complexity of contemporary phenomena in relation to the criteria of the politics of time (dialectic historicisation) and politics of space (geographic difference). In relation to every contemporaneity that has occurred or is occurring at different times and in different places, contemporary art and culture required different conceptualisations of ‘modernisation’ and different conceptualisations of a critical response to the transition of global/local practices from the margins of society to its hegemonic centre, both internationally and locally. In an epistemological/methodological sense I intend to develop critical phenomenology. Critical phenomenology is a project of the politicization/radicalization of conservative phenomenological thinking.


Article received: June 5, 2017; Article accepted: June 12, 2017; Published online: October 15, 2017; Original scholarly paper

How to cite this article: Šuvaković, Miško. "Critical Phenomenology: Borderline Between Grey, Opaque and Non-Transparent Zones – Permanent Transitional Times." AM Journal of Art and Media Studies 14 (2017): 13-31. doi: 10.25038/am.v0i14.203


agency, grey zones, critical phenomenology, diagramatic, globalization, living in a time of crisis, macropolitics, micropolitics, modular, world image

Full Text:



+ Arteast Collection. Ljubljana: Museum of Modern Art, 2000.

Apprich, Clemens, Josephine Berry Slater, Anthony Iles, Oliver Leroine Schultz ed. Provocative Alloys: A Post-Media Anthology. Berlin: Mute Books, 2013.

Arrighi, Giovani, Terence K. Hopkins, and Immanuel Wallerstein. Anti-Systemic Movements. London: Verso, 1989.

Belting, Hans, Andrea Buddensieg, and Peter Weibel ed. The Global Contemporary and the Rise of New Art Worlds. Karlsruhe: ZKM / Center for Art and Media, 2013.

Butler, Judith. Precarious Life. The Powers of Mourning and Violence. London: Verso, 2006.

Carruthers, Peter. The Architecture of the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.

Crary, Jonathan. 24/7. Late Capitalism and the Ends of Sleep. London: Verso, 2014.

De Cauter, Lieven, Ruben De Roo, Karel Vanhaesebrouck ed. Art and Activism in the Age of Globalization. Rotterdam: NAi Publishers, 2011.

Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. A Thousand Plateaus. Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Trans. by Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: University Of Minnesota Press, 1987.

Demos, T. J. The Migrant Image/The Art and Politics of Documentary during Global Crisis. Durham: Duke University Press, 2013.

Diederichsen, Diedrich. On (surplus) Value in Art. Berlin: Stanberg Press, 2008.

Eisenstein, Sergei. The Film Sense. San Diego: A Harvest Book, 1975.

Erjavec, Aleš (ed.). Aesthetic Revolutions and Twentieth-Century Avant-Garde Movements. Durham: Duke University Press, 2015.

Fodor, Jerry A. The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1983.

Foucault, Michael. Discipline and Punish. New York: Vintage Books, 1977.

Goldsmith, Kenneth: Uncreative Writing. New York: Columbia University Press, 2011.

Gordon, Colin (ed.). Foucault, Michel: Power Knowledge: Selected Interviews & Other Writings 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon Books, 1980.

Guattari, Félix. Molecular Revolution: Psychiatry and Politic. London: Penguin, 1984.

Guattari, Félix. Chaosophy. New York: Semiotext(e), 1995.

Hallward, Peter. Out of this World / Deleuze and the Philosophy of Creation. London: Verso, 2006.

Heidegger, Martin. The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. Translated by William Lovitt. New York: Harper and Row, 1977.

Husserl, Edmund. Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology. London: Routledge, 2012.

Laclau, Ernesto. On Populist Reason. London: Verso, 2007.

Lenin.Vladimir. “The State and Revolution” (1917).

Mbembe, Achille. “Necropolitics.” Public Culture 15, 1 (2003): 11–40. doi: 10.1215/08992363-15-1-11

Marazzi, Christian. Capital and Affects. The Politics of the Language Economy. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e), 2011.

Martell, Luke. The Sociology of Globalization. Cambridge UK: Polity, 2010.

Massumi, Brian. Parables for the Virtual – Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham: Duke University Press, 2002.

Mitchell, W. J. T. What Do Pictures Want? The Lives and Loves of Images. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.

Negri, Antonio. Time for Revolution, New York: Continuum, 2003.

Rancierè, Jacques. The Aesthetic Unconscious. Cambridge: Polity, 2010.

Virno, Paolo, Hardt, Michael ed. Radical Thought in Italy: A Potential Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1996.

Virno, Paolo. When the Word Becomes Flesh. Language and Human nature. South Pasadena: Semiotext(e), 2003.

Weibel, Peter. Global Activism. Art and Conflict in the 21st Century. Karlsruhe: ZKM/Center for Art and Media, 2014.

Zdebik, Jakub. Deleuze and the Diagram. Aesthetic Threads in Visual Organization. London: Bloomsbury, 2012.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2017 AM Journal of Art and Media Studies

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

The content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

AM Journal of Art and Media Studies ISSN 2217-9666 - printed, ISSN 2406-1654 - online, UDK 7.01:316.774


Publisher: Faculty of Media and Communications, Singidunum University, Belgrade, Serbia

Indexed in: ERIH PLUSEBSCODOAJ, and in The List of Scientific Journals Categorization of Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of Republic of Serbia.