Extracorporeal Pregnancy as a Feminist Issue
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i8.104Keywords:
extracorporeal pregnancy, ectogenesis, new reproductive technologies, motherhood, feminismAbstract
Extracorporeal pregnancy (ectogenesis) presents perhaps the culmination of reproductive technology (NRT). Second wave feminism welcomed the use of NRT (including extracorporeal pregnancy) as a means of women’s liberation. Later on, theories belonging to the third wave pointed out the negative implications of NRT and reclaimed the power of unassisted reproduction. This paper will try to point out some remaining productive potentials of NRT and extracorporeal pregnancy. The author wishes to explore the changes in the conceptualisation of the integrity of the individual in the context of the feminist critique of ectogenesis.
References
Aristarkhova, Irina. “Ectogenesis and mother as machine.“ Body and Society 11, 3 (2005). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X05056190
Batler, Džudit. Nevolja s rodom – Feminizam i subverzija identiteta. Loznica:Karpos, 2010.
Becker, Gay. The elusive embrio: How Women and Men Approach New Reproductive Technologies. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520925243
Butler. Judith. “Is Kinship Always Already Heterosexual?.” Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 13, 1 (2002): 14–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-13-1-14
Cannold, Leslie. “Women, Ectogenesis, and Ethical Theory.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 12, 1 (1995): 55–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5930.1995.tb00119.x
Dickinson, Donna. Property in the Body: Feminist Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618659
Ferreira, Aline. “The Sexual Politics of Ectogenesis in the To-day and To-morrow Series.” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 34, 1 (2009): 32–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/174327909X421443
Firestone, Shulamith. The Dialectics of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution. New York: Bantam Book, 1970.
Gelfand, Scott and Shook R. John ed. Ectogenesis: Artificial Womb Technology and the Future of Reproduction. New York: VIBS, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401203456
Harraway, Donna. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The reinvention of women. New York: Routledge, 1991.
Holmes, Helen Bequaert, and Laura B. Purdy ed. Feminist Perspectives in Medical Ethics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1992.
Lykke, Nina. “Are Cyborgs Queer? Biological Determinism and Feminist Theory in the Age of New Reproductive Technologies and Reprogenetics.“ Project "Cyborgs and Cyberspace – Between Narration and Sociotechnical Reality", Danish Research Agency, 2000.
McKie, Robin. “Men redundant? Now we don't need women either. “ The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2002/feb/10/medicalscience.research
Mejia, Paula. "Fetuses in Artificial Wombs: Medical Marvel or Misogynist Malpractice?." Newsweek, http://www.newsweek.com/
Milanović, A. M. “Transrodno telo kao mesto transgresije binarno strukturirane rodnosti.” AM Journal of Art and Media Studies 4 (2013): 56–63.
Neyer, Gerda, and Laura Bernardi. “Feminist perspectives on motherhood and reproduction.” Historical Social Research, 2, 36 (2011): 162–176.
Nyrövaara, Eeva. The Feminist Transformation of Bioethics: An Analysis of Theoretical Perspectives and Practical Applications in Feminist Bioethics. PhD diss., University of Helsinki, 2011.
Pitch, Tamar. Pervasive Prevention: a Feminist Reading of the Rise of the Security Society. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2010
Rowland, Robin. Living laboratories: Women and reproductive technologies. Sydney: Macmillan, 1992
Stojanović, Dragana. “Razlika kao mesto odakle: teorijsko izvođenje telesnosti i rodnosti iz perspektive feminizama razlike. “ AM Časopis za studije umetnosti i medija 6 (2014): 25–33.
Strickler, Jennifer. “The new reproductive technology: problem or solution?“ Sociology of Health & Illness 14, 1 (March 1992): 111–132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.ep11007191
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 AM Journal of Art and Media Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
AM Journal of Art and Media Studies ISSN 2217-9666 - printed, ISSN 2406-1654 - online, UDK 7.01:316.774
Contact: amjournal@outlook.com
Publisher: Faculty of Media and Communications, Singidunum University, Belgrade, Serbia
Indexed in: ERIH PLUS, EBSCO, DOAJ, and in The List of Scientific Journals Categorization of Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of Republic of Serbia (M24 in 2021; M23 in 2023). Beginning with No. 12 2017, AM is indexed, abstracted and covered in Clarivate Analytics service ESCI.
