Viscerocepcija: (japansko) telo koje misli i umetnost / Visceroception: Art and a (Japanese) Body that Thinks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i11.153Keywords:
perception, viscera, film, art, Japan, harageiAbstract
Probing of art through creation and perception, proves to be an inevitable and constant element of art theory. Visceral perception seems to be an underrated topic, positioned on a margin of theoretical exploration of the effects which art provokes in the spectatorship. Focus is precisely on this type of perception which allows inner bodily activities and reactions to remain hidden and rarely inspected. Contrary to Cartesian dualism, the symbiotic relation between mind and body in Eastern philosophy, addresses the notion of body thinking, suited for the immediacy of experience in a contact with the outer world. This paper explores various concepts of Japanese aesthetics which immensely value the invisible, the spontaneous and the intuitive. It further emphasizes their connection with visceral perception.
References
Adam, Gyorgy. Visceral Perception: Understanding Internal Cognition. New York: Springer Science + Business Media, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2903-0
Baker, Jennifer. The Tactile Eye – Touch and the Cinematic Experience. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2009.
Gros, Elizabet. “Umetnost, čulni utisak, narod.‟ AM Časopis za studije umetnosti i medija 5 (April 2014): 33–41.
Heisig, James W., Thomas P. Kasulis and John C. Maraldo ed. Japanese Philosophy – A Sourcebook. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21313/hawaii/9780824835521.001.0001
Lebra, Takie S. “The cultural significance of silence in Japanese communication.‟ Multilingua 6, 4 (1987): 345–357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1987.6.4.343
Marks, Laura U. The Skin of the Film. Durham, London: Duke University Press, 2000.
McLuhan, Marshall. Understanding me – the Medium is Massage. Toronto: MIT Press, 2005.
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. “The Film and the New Psychology.‟ In Sense and Non-Sense. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1992, 48–60.
Nakamura, Tomoe. “The Scope of Aisthetics for Comparative Aesthetics.‟ Aesthetics 23, 1 (June 2013): 135–154.
Shaviro, Steven. “The Cinematic Body Redux.‟ http://www.shaviro.com/Othertexts/Cinematic.pdf
Shaviro, Steven. The Cinematic Body. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2006.
Shigenori, Nagatomo. “Ichikawa's View of the Body.‟ Philosophy East and West. October 36, 4 (1986): 375–391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1398994
Sobchack, Vivian. The Address of the Eye – A Phenomenology of Film Experience. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691213279
Tomporek Fukuoka, Eva. “Fenomen japanskog haragei na tlu Zapadnih teorija komunikolokgije i filozofije dijaloga.‟ In Pogledi – Japan u očima Zapada, Zapad u očima Japana. Beograd: Kokoro, 2015.
Varela, Francisco. “The Cosmos Letter: Why the Mind is Not in the Head.‟ 1998. http://www.expo-cosmos.or.jp/letter/letter12e.html
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 AM Journal of Art and Media Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
AM Journal of Art and Media Studies ISSN 2217-9666 - printed, ISSN 2406-1654 - online, UDK 7.01:316.774
Contact: amjournal@outlook.com
Publisher: Faculty of Media and Communications, Singidunum University, Belgrade, Serbia
Indexed in: ERIH PLUS, EBSCO, DOAJ, and in The List of Scientific Journals Categorization of Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of Republic of Serbia (M24 in 2021; M23 in 2023). Beginning with No. 12 2017, AM is indexed, abstracted and covered in Clarivate Analytics service ESCI.
