Deconstruction in Architecture – Continuous Translation through an Open Project
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i12.170Keywords:
architectural discourse, deconstructive discourse, translation, incompleteness, open projectAbstract
Jacques Derrida developed deconstruction as a way of thinking which constantly examines the nature and possibilities of meaning. The paper analyses spatial-economic, cultural and social context in which deconstructive discourse was translated into architectural discourse. Translation between these two discourses happens vice versa. Deconstructivism emphasizes the formal properties of architecture, like postmodernism, which is the subject of exploration by architects such as Coop Himmelblau, Frank Gehry, Eric Owen Moss, etc. According to some interpretations, the only solution for deconstruction in architectural work is incompleteness, an open project which represents never-ending deconstruction. There are different solutions for open projects, and the article highlights projects by architects mentioned above, which seems to manage to achieve continuous deconstruction in practice.
References
Brodbent, Dž. “Arhitektura dekonstruktivizma.” In Istorija moderne arhitekture, knjiga 3. Tradicija modernizma i drugi modernizam, edited by Miloš Petrović, 605–21. Beograd: Arhitektonski fakultet, 2005.
Cook, Peter. “Los Angeles comes of age.” AA Files 1 (Winter 1981–82): 16–24.
Himmelblau, Coop. “The Red Angel.” Quaderns 173 (1987): 88–91.
Himmelblau, Coop. “The Open House.” Quaderns 173 (1987): 92–95.
Himmelblau, Coop. “Baumann studio.” Quaderns 173 (1987): 96–103.
Eisenman, Peter. “The Blue Line Text.” Architectural Design 58, 7/8 (1988): 6–9.
Evensen, Lazo Caroline. Frank Gehry. Minneapolis: Lerner Publishing Group, 2005.
Farrelly, E. M. “The New Spirit.” The Architectural Review 1074 (1986): 7–12.
Jencks, Charles. “Deconstruction: The Pleasure of Absence, Deconstruction in Architecture.” Architectural Design 58, 3/4 (1988): 17–31.
McLeod, Mary. “Architecture and Politics in the Reagan Era: From Postmodernism to Deconstructivism.” Assemblage 8 (Feb., 1989): 22–59. doi:10.2307/3171013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3171013
Stevanović, Vladimir. “Dirty realism and Europe on the edge of postmodernity.” Arhitektura i urbanizam. Časopis za arhitekturu, urbanizam i prostorno planiranje 42 (2016): 7–23. doi:10.5937/a-u0-9415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/a-u0-9415
Šuvaković, Miško. “Hibridna pitanja o dekonstrukciji i umetnosti.” In Glas i pismo: Žak Derida u odjecima, edited by Petar Bojanić, 81–87. Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2005.
Tzonis, A., and L. Lefaivre. “Between Utopia and Reality: Eight Tendencies in Architecture Since 1986 in Europe.” In Architecture in Europe Since 1968: Memory and Invention, 10–23. London: Thames & Hudson, 1992.
Vigli, Mark. “Prevođenje arhitekture: proizvod Vavilona.” In Istorija moderne arhitekture, knjiga 3. Tradicija modernizma i drugi modernizam knjiga 3, edited by Miloš Petrović, 594–604. Beograd: Arhitektonski fakultet, 2005.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 AM Journal of Art and Media Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
AM Journal of Art and Media Studies ISSN 2217-9666 - printed, ISSN 2406-1654 - online, UDK 7.01:316.774
Contact: amjournal@outlook.com
Publisher: Faculty of Media and Communications, Singidunum University, Belgrade, Serbia
Indexed in: ERIH PLUS, EBSCO, DOAJ, and in The List of Scientific Journals Categorization of Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of Republic of Serbia (M24 in 2021; M23 in 2023). Beginning with No. 12 2017, AM is indexed, abstracted and covered in Clarivate Analytics service ESCI.