Becoming Animal of Philosophy: Pragmatism, Pragrammatology, Speculative Pragmatism
Keywords:pragmatism, deconstruction, speculative pragmatism, abduction, becoming animal, metaphor
I argue that American pragmatism can be understood as an effort to recuperate a sense of the animality of thought and thus as an example of what Deleuze and Guattari call a “becoming animal” within the field of philosophy. At issue in this becoming animal of pragmatism is the influence of Charles Peirce’s theory of abduction on the history of pragmatism from its origins to its more recent reception within Jacques Derrida’s (pra)grammatology and Brian Massumi’s speculative pragmatism. Predicated on the evolutionary notion that animal instinct is the source of language, thought, and inquiry, Peirce’s theory of creative inference, or “abduction” as he called it, has allowed generations of pragmatists to begin “shaking philosophy’s dust off their feet and following the call of the wild” (James); to recognize in the origin of their thought something like “the movements of a wild creature toward its goal” (Dewey); to define intellectual inquiry as “doing what comes naturally” (Fish), and to pursue such inquiry “without method” (Rorty). Emerging under the ostensible heading of a new “humanism”, pragmatism exceeds what Derrida calls “the anthropological limit” from the very start, relieving humanism of its exclusive claim to logocentrism by reinscribing the question if not the origin of the logos within the animal kingdom. Yet unlike Derrida, whose rejection of biological continuism in the name of difference prevents him from committing fully to the logic of abduction, Massumi is able to rehabilitate Peirce’s theory of abduction as the foundation for his speculative pragmatism as a result of his commitment to a processual ontology that rejects binary oppositions in favor of “disjunctive syntheses” and “zones of indiscernibility.”
Article received: April 15, 2020; Article accepted: July 1, 2020; Published online: April 15, 2021; Original scholarly paper
Agamben, Giorgio. The Open: Man and Animal. Translated by Kevin Attell. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2004.
Anderson, Douglas. “Peirce on Metaphor.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 20, 4 (Fall 1984): 453– 68.
Anderson, Douglas. “Peirce’s Horse: A Sympathetic and Semeiotic Bond.” In Animal Pragmatism: Rethinking Human-Nonhuman Relations, edited by Erin McKenna and Andrew Light, 86–94. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2004.
Atã, P. and J. Queiroz. “Icon and Abduction: Situatedness in Peircean Cognitive Semiotics.” In Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics 8, edited by L. Magnani, 301–13. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37428-9_17
Bennington, Geoffrey. Derridabase. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1993.
Calarco, Matthew. Thinking Through Animals. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804796538
Collected Papers of Charles S. Peirce, edited by Charles Hartshorne, Paul Weiss, and A. W. Burks. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1931–1961.
Deleuze, Gilles, and Felix Guattari. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Translated by Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press, 1987.
Derrida, Jacques. Of Grammatology. Translated by Gayatri Spivak. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976.
Derrida, Jacques. Aporias. Translated by Thomas Dutoit. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1993.
Derrida, Jacques and Maurizio Ferraris. A Taste for the Secret. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001.
Derrida, Jacques. The Animal that Therefore I Am. Translated by David Wills. New York: Fordham University Press, 2008.
Dewey, John. Art as Experience. New York: Perigee Books, 1980.
Fish, Stanley. Doing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric and the Practice of Theory in Legal and Literary Studies. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11317d7
Gaston, Sean. “Punctuations.” In Reading Derrida’s Of Grammatology, edited by Sean Gaston and Ian Maclachlan, xiii–xxviii. London: Continuum, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472547361
Haraway, Donna. Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge, 1991.
James, William. Pragmatism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1975.
Johnson, Christopher. “Leroi-Gourhan and the Limits of the Human.” French Studies 65, 4 (2011): 471–87. doi: 10.1093/fs/knr134 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/fs/knr134
Kapitan, Tomis (1997). “Peirce and the Structure of Abductive Inference.” In Studies in the Logic of Charles S. Peirce, edited by Nathan Houser, Don Roberts, and James Van Evra, 477–96. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1997.
Kohn, Eduardo. How Forests Think: Toward an Anthropology Beyond the Human. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520276109.001.0001
Kuhn, Thomas. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.
Leroi-Gourhan, André. Gesture and Speech. Translated by Anna Bostock Berger. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1993.
Magnani, Lorenzo. “An Abductive Theory of Scientific Reasoning.” Semiotica 153, 1 (2005): 261–86. doi: 10.1515/semi.2005.2005.153-1-4.261 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2005.2005.153-1-4.261
Massumi, Brian. A User’s Guide to Capitalism and Schizophrenia: Deviations from Deleuze and Guattari. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1992.
Massumi, Brian. What Animals Teach Us about Politics. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822376057
Massumi, Brian. Politics of Affect. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2015.
Peirce, Charles. “Pragmatism in Retrospect: A Last Formulation.” In Philosophical Writings of Peirce, edited by Justus Buchler, 269–89. New York: Dover, 1955.
Peirce, Charles. “Synechism, Fallibilism, and Evolution.” In Philosophical Writings of Peirce, edited by Justus Buchler, 354–60. New York: Dover, 1955.
Peirce, Charles. “A Neglected Argument for the Reality of God.” In Charles S. Peirce: Selected Writings, edited by Philip P. Wiener, 358–79. New York: Dover, 1958.
Peirce, Charles. “The Nature of Meaning.” The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, Volume 2 (1893–1913), edited by The Peirce Edition Project, 208–25. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1998.
Peirce, Charles. “Philosophy and the Conduct of Life.” The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, Volume 2 (1893–1913), edited by The Peirce Edition Project, 27–41. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1998.
Peters, Roger and L. David Mech. “Scent-Marking in Wolves.” In Wolf and Man: Evolution in Parallel, edited by Roberta Hall and Henry Sharp, 133–48. New York: Academic Press, 1978.
Queiroz, João and Floyd Merrell. “Abduction: Between Subjectivity and Objectivity.” Semiotica 153, 1 (2005): 1–7. doi: 10.1515/semi.2005.2005.153-1-4.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2005.2005.153-1-4.1
Richardson, Joan. A Natural History of Pragmatism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Rorty, Richard. “Philosophy as Science, Metaphor, Politics.” In Essays on Heidegger and Others, 9–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609039.002
Rorty, Richard. “Pragmatism without Method.” In Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth, 63–77. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173643.005
Rorty, Richard. “Remarks on Deconstruction and Pragmatism.” In Deconstruction and Pragmatism, edited by Simon Critchley and Chantal Mouffe, 13–18. New York: Routledge, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203431481_chapter_2
Shaviro, Steven. “Consequences of Panpsychism.” In The Nonhuman Turn, edited by Richard Grusin, 19–44. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press, 2015.
Smith, Daniel. “Sense and Literality: Why There Are No Metaphors in Deleuze’s Philosophy.” In Deleuze and Guattari’s Philosophy of Freedom: Freedom’s Refrain, edited by Dorothea Olkowski and Eftichis Pirovolakis, 44–67. New York: Routledge, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429022562-4
Sørensen, Bent, Torkild Thellefsen, and Morten Moth. “Metaphor and Cognition from a Peircean Perspective.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy 43, 3 (2007): 562–74. doi: 10.1353/csp.2007.0033
Stiegler, Bernard. “Derrida and Technology: Fidelity at the Limits of Deconstruction and the Prosthesis of Faith.” In Jacques Derrida and the Humanities: A Critical Reader. edited by Tom Cohen, 238–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511483134.013
Syrotinski, Michael. “Origins: ‘The Most Original and Powerful Ethnocentrism.’” In Reading Derrida’s Of Grammatology, edited by Sean Gaston and Ian Maclachlan, 5–9. New York: Continuum, 2011.
Urpeth, James. “Animal Becomings.” In Animal Philosophy: Ethics and Identity, edited by P. Atterton and M. Calarco, 101–10. New York: Continuum, 2004.
Van Camp, Nathan. “Negotiating the Anthropological Limit: Derrida, Stiegler, and the Question of the Animal.” Between the Species 14, 1 (2011): 57–80. doi: 10.15368/bts.2011v14n1.3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15368/bts.2011v14n1.3
Weber, Samuel. “Texts/Contexts: Closure and Exclusion.” Institution and Interpretation, 3–17. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1987.
Weil, Kari. Thinking Animals: Why Animal Studies Now? New York: Columbia University Press, 2012.
Weiss, Paul. “The Logic of the Creative Process.” In Studies in the Philosophy of Charles Sanders Peirce, edited by Philip P. Wiener and Frederic H. Young, 166–82. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1952.
Wilson, David Sloan. “Evolutionary Social Constructivism.” In The Literary Animal: Evolution and the Nature of Narrative, edited by Jonathan Gottschall and David Sloan Wilson, 20–37. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvw1d5h1.8
Wilson, E. O. Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge. New York: Vintage, 1999.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2023 AM Journal of Art and Media Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
AM Journal of Art and Media Studies ISSN 2217-9666 - printed, ISSN 2406-1654 - online, UDK 7.01:316.774
Publisher: Faculty of Media and Communications, Singidunum University, Belgrade, Serbia
Indexed in: ERIH PLUS, EBSCO, DOAJ, and in The List of Scientific Journals Categorization of Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of Republic of Serbia (M24-2021). Beginning with No. 12 2017, AM is indexed, abstracted and covered in Clarivate Analytics service ESCI.