Revisiting Huxley’s Dystopic Vision of Future Cinema, The Feelies: Immersive Experiences through Contemporary Multisensory Media
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i20.325Keywords:
flow (absorption in pleasure), multi-sensory interaction, multisequential prosthetic enhancement, participatory dramatic agencyAbstract
Aldous Huxley’s concern with media, and in particular with cinema, is one of the most conspicuous components of his work as a social critic and as a novelist. Evaluating its potential societal functions, as an artistic genre, a didactic cultural tool for documentaries or as a mass entertainment venue, determined his critical relationship towards the medium. Due to his impaired eyesight, Huxley’s attention to perception, intertwined with advancing cinema-technologies, was not restricted to the visual, but extended to all of the human senses, as he demonstrated in the Feelies of his novel Brave New World (1932). Primarily with regard to mechanomorphic reflexes of human conditioning, this cinematic concept is interpreted by drawing from articles and essays of evolutionary, psychological, political, and aesthetic perspectives that Huxley developed on a parallel writing track in popular print media during the 1920s/30s. In confronting modes of multisensory immersion around 1900 with some of the 20th/21st centuries, this contribution reevaluates Huxley’s vision of future cinema.
Article received: June 10, 2019; Article accepted: July 6, 2019; Published online: October 15, 2019; Original scholarly paper
References
“4DX – Extreme Cinema.” Cineworld, https://www.cineworld.co.uk/4dx#/. Accessed February 21, 2019.
Baker, Robert S. and James Sexton ed. Aldous Huxley – Complete Essays, Vol. 1–4, edited by Robert S.
Baker and James Sexton, 186–90. Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 2000.
Barbosa, Sonsoles Hernandes. “The 1900 World’s Fair or the Attraction of the Senses: The Case of the
Maréorama.” The Senses and Society 10, 1 (2015): 41–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17458927.2015.1108670
Bransford, Walt. “The Past was no Illusion.” In Digital Illusion: Entertaining the Future with High Technology,
contributing editor Clark Dodsworth Jr., 49–57. New York: Addison-Wesley Professional,
Buck-Morss, Susan. “Prosthesis of Perception: A Historical Account.” In The Senses Still: Perception and
Memory in Material Culture in Modernity, edited by C. Nadia Seremetakis, 45–62. Chicago: University
of Chicago Press, 1996.
Deese, R. S. We Are Amphibians: Julian and Aldous Huxley on the Future of our Species. Oakland, CA: The
University of California Press, 2015.
Delisle Burns, Cecil. Industry and Civilization. London: Allen and Unwin, 1925.
Frost, Laura. The Problem with Pleasure – Modernism and its Discontents. New York: Columbia University
Press, 2013.
Heilig, Morton. “The Cinema of the Future.” In Technology and Culture. The Film Reader, edited by Andrew
Utterson, 17–25. London, New York: Routledge, 2005.
Huhtamo, Erkki. “Encapsulated Bodies in Motion: Simulators and the Quest for Total Immersion,” subchapter
“Phantom Bodies in a Phantom Train.” In Critical Issues in Electronic Media, edited by
Simon Penny, 168–171. New York: State University of New York Press, 1995.
Huxley, Aldous. Brave New World. London: Penguin, Random House, 2007.
Kane, Josephine. “Edwardian Amusement Parks: The Pleasure Garden Reborn.” In The Pleasure Garden,
from Vauxhall to Coney Island, edited by Jonathan Conlin 217–46. Philadelphia: University of
Pennsylvania Press, 2013.
Kane, Josephine. The Architecture of Pleasure: British Amusement Parks 1900–1939. London: Routledge,
[2013].
McLuhan, Marshall. Understanding Media – The Extensions of Man – Critical Edition, edited by W. Terrence
Gordon and Corte Madera. CA: Gingko Press, 2003, [1964].
Metz, Christian. Psychoanalysis and Cinema – The Imaginary Signifier. London: MacMillan Press, 1983.
Miles Peter and Malcom Smith. “Aldous Huxley: The Art of Life and the Threat of Leisure.” In Cinema,
Literature & Society – Elite and Mass Culture in Interwar Britain, edited by Peter Miles and Malcom
Smith 102–122. London, New York, Sydney: Croom Helm, 1987.
Neumeyer, Martin and Esther Neumeyer. Leisure and Recreation: A Study of Leisure and Recreation in
their sociological Aspects. New York: Barnes, 1936.
Seltzer, Mark. Bodies and Machines. New York, London: Routledge, 1992.
Snape, Robert and Helen Pussard. “Theorisations of Leisure in Inter-War Britain.” Leisure Studies 32, 1
(2013): 1–18. doi:10.1080/02614367.2011.629371 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2011.629371
Thorpe, Andrew. The Longman Companion to Britain in the Era of two World Wars: 1914-45. London:
Longman, 1996.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 AM Journal of Art and Media Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
AM Journal of Art and Media Studies ISSN 2217-9666 - printed, ISSN 2406-1654 - online, UDK 7.01:316.774
Contact: amjournal@outlook.com
Publisher: Faculty of Media and Communications, Singidunum University, Belgrade, Serbia
Indexed in: ERIH PLUS, EBSCO, DOAJ, and in The List of Scientific Journals Categorization of Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of Republic of Serbia (M24 in 2021; M23 in 2023). Beginning with No. 12 2017, AM is indexed, abstracted and covered in Clarivate Analytics service ESCI.