Revisiting Huxley’s Dystopic Vision of Future Cinema, The Feelies: Immersive Experiences through Contemporary Multisensory Media

Authors

  • Manfred Milz

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i20.325

Keywords:

flow (absorption in pleasure), multi-sensory interaction, multisequential prosthetic enhancement, participatory dramatic agency

Abstract

Aldous Huxley’s concern with media, and in particular with cinema, is one of the most conspicuous components of his work as a social critic and as a novelist. Evaluating its potential societal functions, as an artistic genre, a didactic cultural tool for documentaries or as a mass entertainment venue, determined his critical relationship towards the medium. Due to his impaired eyesight, Huxley’s attention to perception, intertwined with advancing cinema-technologies, was not restricted to the visual, but extended to all of the human senses, as he demonstrated in the Feelies of his novel Brave New World (1932). Primarily with regard to mechanomorphic reflexes of human conditioning, this cinematic concept is interpreted by drawing from articles and essays of evolutionary, psychological, political, and aesthetic perspectives that Huxley developed on a parallel writing track in popular print media during the 1920s/30s. In confronting modes of multisensory immersion around 1900 with some of the 20th/21st centuries, this contribution reevaluates Huxley’s vision of future cinema.

 

Article received: June 10, 2019; Article accepted: July 6, 2019; Published online: October 15, 2019; Original scholarly paper

Author Biography

Manfred Milz

Faculty of Languages, Literature and Culture, University of Regensburg
Germany

Manfred Milz, Ph.D., is Research Associate at the Institute of Media, Language and Culture at Regensburg University (Germany), following his appointment as a Guest Professor. While holding research and teaching positions in the United Arab Emirates, Turkey, and at Goethe University in Frankfurt am Main, he has primarily published books, book chapters and refereed journal articles on the origins of 20th-century visual culture in the Age of European Romanticism – particularly regarding questions of process ontology. After a long-term DFG research-grant within the post-graduate study group Psychische Energien bildender Kunst, he published his Ph.D., a comparative study on Alberto Giacometti and Samuel Beckett, as a book. He has been guest-editor of The European Legacy, edited and co-authored the volume Facing Mental Landscapes as well as the catalog of the Shahnameh Millenium exhibition at the Prince’s Gallery in London, Painting the Persian Book of Kings Today: Ancient Text and Modern Images.

References

“4DX – Extreme Cinema.” Cineworld, https://www.cineworld.co.uk/4dx#/. Accessed February 21, 2019.

Baker, Robert S. and James Sexton ed. Aldous Huxley – Complete Essays, Vol. 1–4, edited by Robert S.

Baker and James Sexton, 186–90. Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 2000.

Barbosa, Sonsoles Hernandes. “The 1900 World’s Fair or the Attraction of the Senses: The Case of the

Maréorama.” The Senses and Society 10, 1 (2015): 41–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17458927.2015.1108670

Bransford, Walt. “The Past was no Illusion.” In Digital Illusion: Entertaining the Future with High Technology,

contributing editor Clark Dodsworth Jr., 49–57. New York: Addison-Wesley Professional,

Buck-Morss, Susan. “Prosthesis of Perception: A Historical Account.” In The Senses Still: Perception and

Memory in Material Culture in Modernity, edited by C. Nadia Seremetakis, 45–62. Chicago: University

of Chicago Press, 1996.

Deese, R. S. We Are Amphibians: Julian and Aldous Huxley on the Future of our Species. Oakland, CA: The

University of California Press, 2015.

Delisle Burns, Cecil. Industry and Civilization. London: Allen and Unwin, 1925.

Frost, Laura. The Problem with Pleasure – Modernism and its Discontents. New York: Columbia University

Press, 2013.

Heilig, Morton. “The Cinema of the Future.” In Technology and Culture. The Film Reader, edited by Andrew

Utterson, 17–25. London, New York: Routledge, 2005.

Huhtamo, Erkki. “Encapsulated Bodies in Motion: Simulators and the Quest for Total Immersion,” subchapter

“Phantom Bodies in a Phantom Train.” In Critical Issues in Electronic Media, edited by

Simon Penny, 168–171. New York: State University of New York Press, 1995.

Huxley, Aldous. Brave New World. London: Penguin, Random House, 2007.

Kane, Josephine. “Edwardian Amusement Parks: The Pleasure Garden Reborn.” In The Pleasure Garden,

from Vauxhall to Coney Island, edited by Jonathan Conlin 217–46. Philadelphia: University of

Pennsylvania Press, 2013.

Kane, Josephine. The Architecture of Pleasure: British Amusement Parks 1900–1939. London: Routledge,

[2013].

McLuhan, Marshall. Understanding Media – The Extensions of Man – Critical Edition, edited by W. Terrence

Gordon and Corte Madera. CA: Gingko Press, 2003, [1964].

Metz, Christian. Psychoanalysis and Cinema – The Imaginary Signifier. London: MacMillan Press, 1983.

Miles Peter and Malcom Smith. “Aldous Huxley: The Art of Life and the Threat of Leisure.” In Cinema,

Literature & Society – Elite and Mass Culture in Interwar Britain, edited by Peter Miles and Malcom

Smith 102–122. London, New York, Sydney: Croom Helm, 1987.

Neumeyer, Martin and Esther Neumeyer. Leisure and Recreation: A Study of Leisure and Recreation in

their sociological Aspects. New York: Barnes, 1936.

Seltzer, Mark. Bodies and Machines. New York, London: Routledge, 1992.

Snape, Robert and Helen Pussard. “Theorisations of Leisure in Inter-War Britain.” Leisure Studies 32, 1

(2013): 1–18. doi:10.1080/02614367.2011.629371 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2011.629371

Thorpe, Andrew. The Longman Companion to Britain in the Era of two World Wars: 1914-45. London:

Longman, 1996.

Downloads

Published

15.10.2019

How to Cite

Milz, M. (2019). Revisiting Huxley’s Dystopic Vision of Future Cinema, The Feelies: Immersive Experiences through Contemporary Multisensory Media. AM Journal of Art and Media Studies, (20), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i20.325

Issue

Section

Main Topic: Contemporary Aesthetics of Media and Post-Media Art Practices