On the Relationship of Landscape and Painting

Authors

  • Deniz Balık Lökçe
  • Deniz Balık Lökçe

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i19.305

Keywords:

landscape architecture, anti-landscape, non-landscape, landscape painting, visual arts, artist

Abstract

This paper intends to sketch out how the understanding of landscape has changed today, using painting as an interpretative tool. As this paper argues, the contemporary sense of landscape is considered through historical, political, social, cultural, and aesthetic facets. Differentiating from the Kantian notion of landscape as an aesthetic category in the domain of visual arts, it has achieved multiple layers of meaning, rather than only referring to gardens and agricultural areas. The extent of the landscape began to change in the 19th century due to industrialization, exploration of new territories, and the development of technology, botany, and geography. Since the 20th century, the concept has also included immaterial constituents in addition to technological, cultural, and social developments. It has become a social construct as an expression of ideas, memories, imagination, and feelings. Pointing to an active and flowing system, rather than a static and visual one, today, the landscape is grasped as an interdisciplinary and collaborative production. It defies distinct urban zonings and proposes ambiguity, vagueness, and contradiction, as it expands the issue through the concepts of anti-landscape and non-landscape. Anti-landscape indicates marginalized and unsuccessfully man-modified lands, whereas non-landscape describes unused and neglected lands. This paper traces the shift of landscape as a dynamic force in the recent paintings of the contemporary Turkish artist, Yıldız Arun. Her works in landscape, anti-landscape, and non-landscape reflect immateriality and immanence as a dynamic and interactive system. In her paintings, the landscape emerges as an affective field of an internal order with a capacity to transmit affects and sensations in Deleuzian sense. It becomes a force field, which flows into a multiplicity of intensities, revealed by layers of colors, lines, and brush strokes. The juxtaposition of spirituality and materiality turns her canvases into generative fields of multiple encounters affected by each stroke. As this paper shows, the landscape does not point to a pre-defined, extrinsic, static, and visual area, but a force field in flux, with a capacity to produce potentials, reciprocal relations, and immanent affects.

Article received: April 17, 2019; Article accepted: June 23, 2019; Published online: September 15, 2019; Original scholarly paper

 

Author Biographies

Deniz Balık Lökçe

Gökhan Balik
Department of Landscape Architecture, Trakya University, Edirne
Turkey

Gökhan Balık holds a Ph.D. and an M.Sc. from Ege University in Landscape Management. He currently works at Trakya University Department of Landscape Architecture. He has presented in various international conferences, published articles in journals and edited books. His work focuses on GIS, ecology, soundscape, landscape design and management.

Department of Architecture, Dokuz Eylül University, Izmir
Turkey

Deniz Balık Lökçe holds a Ph.D. from Dokuz Eylül University (2014) and an M.Sc. from Istanbul Technical University (2009) in Architectural Design. She currently works at Dokuz Eylül University Department of Architecture. Her work focuses on the history, theory, and criticism of architecture, art, culture, society, media, and urban space.

Deniz Balık Lökçe

Department of Architecture, Dokuz Eylül University, Izmir
Turkey

Deniz Balık Lökçe holds a Ph.D. from Dokuz Eylül University (2014) and an M.Sc. from Istanbul Technical University (2009) in Architectural Design. She currently works at Dokuz Eylül University Department of Architecture. Her work focuses on the history, theory, and criticism of architecture, art, culture, society, media, and urban space.

References

Antrop, Marc. “A Brief History of Landscape Research.” In The Routledge Companion to Landscape Studies, edited by Peter Howard, Ian Thompson, and Emma Waterton, 12–22. London, New York: Routledge, 2013.

Antrop, Marc and Veerle Van Eetvelde. Landscape Perspectives: The Holistic Nature of Landscape. Dordrecht: Springer, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1183-6

Arun, Yıldız. “Yıldız Arun: Contemporary Artist & Traveler,” Accessed June 22, 2019. https://yildizarun.wixsite.com/yildizarun

Bigell, Werner. “Fear and Fascination: Anti-Landscapes between Material Resistance and Material Transcendence.” In The Anti-Landscape, edited by David E. Nye and Sarah S. Elkind, 129–48. Leiden: Rodopi, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401211697_009

Bigell, Werner and Cheng Chang. “The Meanings of Landscape: Historical Development, Cultural Frames, Linguistic Variation, and Antonyms.” Ecozon@: European Journal of Literature, Culture and Environment 5, 1 (2014): 84–103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37536/ECOZONA.2014.5.1.588

Claval, Paul. “The Languages of Rural Landscapes.” In European Rural Landscapes: Persistence and Change in a Globalising Environment, edited by Hannes Palang, Helen Sooväli, Marc Antrop, and Gunhild Setten, 11–39. Dordrecht: Springer, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-48512-1_2

Cosgrove, Denis E. “Introduction to Social Formation and Symbolic Landscape.” In Landscape Theory, edited by James Elkins and Rachael Ziady DeLue, 17–42. London, New York: Routledge, 2008.

DeLue, Rachael Ziady. “Elusive Landscapes and Shifting Grounds.” In Landscape Theory, edited by James Elkins and Rachael Ziady DeLue, 3–14. London, New York: Routledge, 2008.

Deleuze, Gilles. Francis Bacon: The Logic of Sensation, trans. Daniel W. Smith. London, New York: Continuum, 2004.

Freud, Sigmund. The Uncanny, trans. D. McLintock. London: Penguin Books, 2003.

Gilpin, William. “The Principles of Painting Considered, So Far as They Relate to Prints.” In Art in Theory 1648–1815: An Anthology of Changing Ideas, edited by Charles Harrison, Paul Wood, and Jason Gaiger, 820–23. Malden, Oxford: Blackwell, 2000.

Gilpin, William. “On Picturesque Beauty.” In Art in Theory 1648–1815: An Anthology of Changing Ideas, edited by Charles Harrison, Paul Wood, and Jason Gaiger, 857–62. Malden, Oxford: Blackwell, 2000.

Häyrynen, Maunu. “Lost Landscapes: Degraded Landscape as Anti-Landscape.” In The Anti-Landscape, edited by David E. Nye and Sarah S. Elkind, 149–58. Leiden: Rodopi, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401211697_010

Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Aesthetic Judgment, edited and translated by James Creed Meredith. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1911.

McTighe, Sheila. Nicolas Poussin’s Landscape Allegories. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

Merkel, Jayne. “Urban American Landscape.” Architectural Design 77, 2 (2007): 36–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.422

Moya Pellitero, Ana Maria. “Wasteland as Landscape: the Need of a New Perceptual Approach.” In Landscape and Ruins: Planning and Design for the Regeneration of Derelict Places: Proceedings of the European Council of Landscape Architecture Schools Conference, edited by Adriana Ghersi, Francesca Mazzino, 97–105. Genova: Alinea Editrice, 2009.

Nicholson, Malcolm. Historical Introduction: Alexander von Humboldt Personal Narrative of a Journey to the Equinoctial Regions of the New Continent. London: Penguin, 1995.

Nomade, Sebastien et al. “A 36,000-Year-Old Volcanic Eruption Depicted in the Chauvet-Pont d’Arc Cave (Ardèche, France)?” Plos One 11, 1 (2016). Accessed July 20, 2019. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/ journal.pone.0146621#sec001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146621

Nye, David E. “Are Blackouts Landscapes?” American Studies in Scandinavia 39, 2 (2007): 72–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22439/asca.v39i2.4609

Olmsted, Frederick Law. Civilizing American Cities: Writings on City Landscapes, edited by S. B. Sutton. New York: Da Capo Press, 1997.

Schmitt, Axel K. et al. “Identifying the Volcanic Eruption Depicted in a Neolithic Painting at Catalhoyuk, Central Anatolia, Turkey.” PLoS ONE 9, 1 (2014). Accessed July 20, 2019. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id= 10.1371/journal.pone.0084711. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084711

Shane, Grahame. “Recombinant Landscapes in the American City.” Architectural Design 77, 2 (2007): 24–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.421

Vidler, Anthony. The Architectural Uncanny: Essays in the Modern Unhomely. Cambridge, London: The MIT Press, 1994.

Wang, Chuan. “Historical Origins of Landscape Painting and Chinese Gardens.” Asian Social Science 5, 10 (2009): 137–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v5n10p137

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i19.305 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i19.305

Downloads

Published

15.09.2019

How to Cite

Balık Lökçe, D., & Balık Lökçe, D. (2019). On the Relationship of Landscape and Painting. AM Journal of Art and Media Studies, (19), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i19.305