New Communication Forms and Political Framing: Twitter in Donald Trump's Presidential Campaign
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i16.259Keywords:
Trump, communication, Twitter, social media, mediation, framingAbstract
Technological development has made it possible for the modern individual to understand the world around them using a computer and screen as their fundamental means of accessing information. With analysis of certain features of modern communication and new media, and of communication forms determined by new ‘agents’ such as the Internet, the mobile phone, social media – and most of all Twitter – it can be concluded that new media channels are no longer merely an asset, but also a place of social interaction. The ways in which social media are used influence the creation of an altered image of the world around us. The custom-made environment of information which reaches the user serves to diminish the chances for a more comprehensive perception. The era of Donald Trump is a striking example of the use of new media, primarily Twitter, as a powerful means of reaching a significant number of future voters. The way in which information is framed on Twitter is rooted in the theoretical basics of framing, and as such has played a significant role in establishing Trump’s political superiority.
Article received: March 25, 2018; Article accepted: April 10, 2018; Published online: September 15, 2018; Preliminary report – Short Communications
How to cite this article: Vlatković, Sandra. "New Communication Forms and Political Framing: Twitter in Donald Trump's Presidential Campaign." AM Journal of Art And Media Studies 16 (2018): 123−134. doi: 10.25038/am.v0i16.259
References
Ahmadian, Sara, Sare Azarshahi and Delroy L. Paulhus. “Explaining Donald Trump via communication style: Grandiosity, informality, and dynamism.” Personality and Individual Differences 107 (2017): 49–53. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.11.018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.11.018
Anderson, Bryan. “Tweeter-in-Chief: A Content Analysis of President Trump’s Tweeting Habits.” Elon Journal of Undergraduate Research in Communications 8, 2 (2017): 36–47.
Bell, Daniel. The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. New York: Basic Books, 1973.
Bogdanić, Aleksandar. “Nova medijska paradigma – od medijacije do medijatizacije društvenog komuniciranja.” Politeia 3, 5 (2013): 11–37. doi: 10.7251/pol1305011B DOI: https://doi.org/10.7251/POL1305011B
Castells, Manuel. The Rise of the Network Society, The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Oxford: Blackwell, 1996, second edition, 2009.
Confessore, Nicholas and Karen Yourish. “$2 Billion Worth of Free Media for Donald Trump.” New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/16/upshot/measuring-donald-trumps-mammoth-advantage-in-free-media.html. Accessed January 3, 2017.
Conway A., Bethany, Kate Kenski and Di Wang. “Twitter Use by Presidential Primary Candidates During the 2012 Campaign.” American Behavioral Scientist 57, 11 (2013): 1596–610. doi/10.1177/0002764213489014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213489014
Dutta, Soumitra, and Matthew Fraser. “Barack Obama and the Facebook Election.” Usnews. https://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2008/11/19/barack-obama-and-the-facebook-election. Accessed January 3, 2017.
Ember, Sydney, and Mike Isaac. “For Election Day Influence, Twitter Ruled Social Media.” New York Times https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/09/technology/for-election-day-chatter-twitter-ruled-social-media.html. Accessed May 18, 2018.
Gross, H. Justin, and Kaylee T. Johnson. “Twitter Taunts and Tirades: Negative Campaigning in the Age of Trump.” Political Science and Politics 49, 4 (2016): 748–54. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096516001700 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096516001700
Hallahan, Kirk. “Seven models of framing: Implications for public relations.” Journal of Public Relations Research 11, 3 (1999): 205–42. doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr1103_02 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr1103_02
Hänggli, Regula and Hanspeter Kriesi. “Frame construction and frame promotion (strategic framing choices).” American Behavioral Scientist 56, 3 (2012): 260–78. doi.org/10.1177/0002764211426325 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211426325
Hanke, Michael. “Vilém Flusser Nucleus Research Group.” Flusserstudies 2 (2006). http://www.flusserstudies.net/sites/www.flusserstudies.net/files/media/attachments/vilem-flusser-nucleus-research-group02.pdf. Accessed January 10, 2017.
Jenkins, Henry. Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York, London: New York University Press, 2006.
Kalsnes, Bente. “The Social Media Paradox Explained: Comparing Political Parties’ Facebook Strategy Versus Practice.” Social Media Society 2, 2 (2016): 1–11. doi:10.1177/2056305116644616 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116644616
Kastels, Manuel. Moć komunikacije. Translated by Tijana Spasić, Đorđe Trajković. Beograd: Clio, 2014.
Krotz, Friedrich. “Media Connectivity: Concepts, Conditions and Consequences.” In: Connectivity, Networks, and Flows. Conceptualizing Contemporary Communications, edited by Andreas Hepp, Friedrich Krotz, Shaun Moores, Shaun Winter, and Carsten Cresskill, 13–33. New Jersey: Hampton Press, 2008.
Lapowsky, Issie. “Here’s how Facebook actually won Trump the presidency.” Wired. https://www.wired.com/2016/11/facebook-won-trump-election-not-just-fake-news/. Accessed December 26, 2016.
Larson, Annika Kay. “Donald Trump’s Twitter and His Influence on the Media: A Study of How Political Social Media Accounts Impact Press Coverage.” University of Washington http://www.com.washington.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Larson-Honors-Thesis-Final.pdf. Accessed May 18, 2018.
Li, Yuncheng, Jiebo Luo, Richard Niemi and Yu Wang. “To Follow or Not to Follow: Analyzing the Growth Patterns of the Trumpists on Twitter.” eprint arXiv:1603.08174. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1603.08174.pdf. Accessed May 18, 2018.
Manovich, Lev. The Language of New Media. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2001.
Nielsen Social Media Report 2016, www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/reports/2017/2016-nielsen-social-media-report.html.Accessed January 2, 2017.
Petrović, Dalibor. “Moć je u mrežama.” In Moć komunikacije, edited by Manuel Kastels, 613–29. Beograd: Clio, 2014.
Scheufele, Dietram A. “Framing as a theory of media effects.” Journal of Communication 49, 1 (1999): 103–22. doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i16.259 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i16.259
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 AM Journal of Art and Media Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
AM Journal of Art and Media Studies ISSN 2217-9666 - printed, ISSN 2406-1654 - online, UDK 7.01:316.774
Contact: amjournal@outlook.com
Publisher: Faculty of Media and Communications, Singidunum University, Belgrade, Serbia
Indexed in: ERIH PLUS, EBSCO, DOAJ, and in The List of Scientific Journals Categorization of Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of Republic of Serbia (M24 in 2021; M23 in 2023). Beginning with No. 12 2017, AM is indexed, abstracted and covered in Clarivate Analytics service ESCI.