The Construction of Identity in Digital Space

Authors

  • Dragana Deh
  • Danica Glođović

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i16.257

Keywords:

identity, construction of identity, digital space, social desirability

Abstract

The construction of personality and its development through time is influenced by many factors, and as particularly important from the aspect of this essay, we would stress the social factor as well as the influence of digital space and existence: the participation of the individual in the digital world. The emergence of new technologies and the acceleration of the pace of life significantly contributes to the construction of identities in digital space, based on a number of influences, such as: the possibility of a ‘second life’, i.e. different presentation of oneself (of life) at the virtual level, an increase of social desirability, changing the perception of oneself and access to new acquaintances and experiences, and knowledge and information and selection of personal data. Digital identity opens the possibility of abuse and consequences. These include the circumstances of insufficient protection of privacy, discovery and illegal use of permanently memorized data in meta-media society and digital space, especially on social networks, and the possibility of manipulating and controlling the identity of another as well as the possibility of placement multiple identities, which brings questions the legitimacy of data. In addition to the fact that digital space has opened up possibilities for changing the way of life in all spheres, it seems that the most pronounced influence (both at the level of quality and quantity) is particularly visible on the changes in the design of the personal identity of the individual.

 

Article received: March 23, 2018; Article accepted: April 10, 2018; Published online: September 15, 2018; Preliminary report – Short Communications

How to cite this article: Deg, Dragana, Danica Glođović. "The Construction of Identity in Digital Space." AM Journal of Art and Media Studies 16 (2018): 101−111. doi: 10.25038/am.v0i16.257

Author Biographies

Dragana Deh

Dragana Deh
Faculty of Media and Communications, Singidunum University, Belgrade
Serbia

Dragana Deh is an assistant and Ph.D. student at the Faculty of Media and Communications, Singidunum University in Belgrade, Serbia. Holding a Master of Psychology. She has completed several education and specialist trainings in the field of psychotherapy and coaching skills. She is engaged in study programs on psychological and communicational practices at the Faculty. She was born in 1966.

 

Danica Glođović

Danica Glođović
Faculty of Media and Communications, Singidunum University, Belgrade
Serbia

Danica Glođović is a graphic and web designer and founder and CEO of Roux Design. She also works as a teaching associate at the Faculty of Textile Design, Technology and Management, Belgrade University, and is a Ph.D. student of Transdisciplinary studies of Modern Arts and Media, on the Faculty of Media and Communications. She was born in 1985.

References

Allison, Arthur, James Currall, Michael Moss, and Susan Stuart. “Digital identity matters.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 56, 4 (2005): 364–72. doi: 10.1002/asi.20112 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20112

Andevski, Milica, and Željko Vučković. “Daroviti u diskursu digitalnog optimizma i nihilizma.” Darovitost i moralnost (2012): 91–102.

Auslander, Philip. “Live From Cyberspace: or, I was sitting at my computer this guy appeared he thought I was a bot.” PAJ: A Journal of Performance and Art 24, 1 (2002): 16–21. doi: 10.1162/152028101753401767 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/152028101753401767

Belk, Russell W. “Extended Self in a Digital World.” Journal of Consumer Research 40, 3 (2013): 477–500. doi: 10.1086/671052 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/671052

Boon, Stuart, and Christine Sinclair. “A world I don’t inhabit: Disquiet and identity in Second Life and Facebook.” Educational Media International 46, 2 (2009): 99–110. doi: 10.1080/09523980902933565 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09523980902933565

Boyd, Dana. “Faceted id/entity: Managing representation in a digital world.” (2002). Master program thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. http://www.danah.org/papers/Thesis.FacetedIdentity.pdf. Accessed July 10, 2017. doi: 10.1234/12345678

Byron, Tanya. “Safer children in a digital world: The report of the Byron Review: Be safe, be aware, have fun.” (2008). http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/7332/7/Final%20Report%20Bookmarked_Redacted.pdf. Accessed July 10, 2017.

Camp, J. L. “Digital identity.” IEEE Technology and society Magazine 23, 3 (2004): 34–41. doi: 10.1109/mtas.2004.1337889 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MTAS.2004.1337889

Čekić, Jovan, Jelisaveta Blagojević, ed. Moć/Mediji. Beograd: Fakultet za medije i komunikacije, 2012.

DeRobertis, Eugene M. “Deriving a Humanistic Theory of Child Development from the Works of Carl R. Rogers and Karen Horney.” The Humanistic Psychologist 34, 2 (2006): 177–99. doi: 10.1207/s15473333thp3402_5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15473333thp3402_5

Goldman, Shelley, Angela Booker, and Meghan McDermott. “Mixing the Digital, Social, and Cultural: Learning, Identity, and Agency in Youth Participation.” Youth, Identity, and Digital Media (2008): 185–206. doi: 10.1162/dmal.9780262524834.185

Hansen, Marit, Ari Schwartz, and Alissa Cooper. “Privacy and Identity Management.” IEEE Security & Privacy 6, 2 (2008): 1–9. doi: 10.1109/MSP.2008.41 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2008.41

Haramija, Predrag. “Donosi li internet novo poimanje čovjeka? Osvrt na viđenje čovjeka među sljedbenicima digitalne kulture.” Obnovljeni život: časopis za filozofiju i religijske znanosti 64, 3 (2009): 363–74.

Hornbæk, Kasper, and Erik Frøkjær. “Evaluating User Interfaces with Metaphors of Human Thinking.” In ERCIM Workshop on User Interfaces for All, 486–507. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36572-9_38

Hughes, Sam Graham-Felsen, Kate Allbright-Hannah, Scott Goodstein, Steve Grove, Randi Zuckerberg, Chloe Sladden, and Brittany Bohnet. “Obama and the power of social media and technology.” The European Business Review (May-June 2010): 16–21.

Manovich, Lev. “An archeology of a computer screen.” Kunstforum International 132 (1995): 124–35.

Mitchell, W. J. Thomas. What Do Pictures Want?: The Lives and Loves of Images. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226245904.001.0001

Paris, Bernard J. “Karen Horney’s Vision of the Self.” The American Journal of Psychoanalysis 59, 2 (1999): 157–66

Plesa, Patric. “Schopenhauer's Psychological Worldview: History, Philosophy and Relevance.” Msc. diss., York University, Toronto, Ontario, 2014.

Saftich, Dario. “Anaheim’s theory of aesthetics and figures of speech.” Metodički obzori: časopis za odgojno-obrazovnu teoriju i praksu 5, 10 (2010): 65–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32728/mo.05.2.2010.05

Sarma, Amardeo C. and João Girão. “Identities in the Future Internet of Things.” Wireless Personal Communications 49, 3 (2009): 353–63. doi: 10.1007/s11277-009-9697-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-009-9697-0

Stojnić, Aneta. “Digital anthropomorphism: Performers avatars and chat-bots.” Performance Research 20, 2 (2015): 70–77. doi: 10.1080/13528165.2015.1026733 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13528165.2015.1026733

Trebješanin, Zarko. Rečnik psihologije. Beograd: Stubovi kulture, 2008.

Väliaho, Pasi. Biopolitica Screens: Image, Power, and the Neoliberal Brain. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9587.001.0001

Zhao, Shanyang, Sherri Grasmuck, and Jason Martin. “Identity Construction on Facebook: Digital Empowerment in Anchored Relationships.” Computers in Human Behavior 24, 5 (2008): 1816–36. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.012

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i16.257 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i16.257

Downloads

Published

15.09.2018

How to Cite

Deh, D., & Glođović, D. (2018). The Construction of Identity in Digital Space. AM Journal of Art and Media Studies, (16), 101–111. https://doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i16.257