Speculative Virontology: Malevolent Infrastructure against the Design of Infrastructural Intimacy in Pulse

Authors

  • Andrija Filipović

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i28.525

Keywords:

virontology, design, infrastructure, intimacy, malevolency, horror

Abstract

In this article, speculative virontology refers to a form of thought that revalues the biontological framework present in current queer theoretical and new materialist thinking. Using an archive of horror films, Paul Golding’s Pulse from 1988 in particular, this article points toward malevolent infrastructure – the conceptualization of matter that is performatively terrorizing the closedness of mutually constitutive design of infrastructural intimacy and the immanence of biontology. Both intimacy and immanence depend on production of space and time which exclude forms of life that are not white middle-class cisnormative (re)productive heterosexuality and thus deemed not properly alive and outside of Being. The figure of the Virus upsets these processes of exclusion and divisions, and reorders conceptuality away from immanence and biontology toward what is non-biontological, toward that which is neither Life nor Nonlife.

Author Biography

Andrija Filipović

Faculty of Media and Communications, Singidunum University, Belgrade
Serbia

Andrija Filipović is Associate Professor at the Faculty of Media and Communications, Singidunum University in Belgrade, Serbia. They are the author of Arsahumana: Anthropocene ontographies in the 21 st century art and culture (2022), Conditio ahumana: Immanence and the ahuman in the Anthropocene (2019), and monographs on Brian Massumi (2016) and Gilles Deleuze (2015). Their articles appeared in Sexualities, The Comparatist, Contemporary Social Science, Journal of Homosexuality, NORMA, and a number of edited volumes. Their research interests include environmental humanities, queer theory, and contemporary philosophy.

References

Abram, Simone, Winthereik, Brit Ross, and Thomas Yarrow. “Current thinking – an introduction.” In Electrifying Anthropology: Exploring Electrical Practices and Infrastructures, edited by Simone Abram, Brit Ross Winthereik, and Thomas Yarros, 1–22. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350102675.0006

Alloa, Emmanuel and Élie During, eds. Choses en soi: Métaphysique du réalisme. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/puf.alloa.2018.01.0149

Bennett, Jane. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham: Duke University Press, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822391623

Colebrook, Claire. Death of the PostHuman: Essays on Extinction, Vol. 1. Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press and Michigan Publishing, University of Michigan Library, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/ohp.12329362.0001.001

Johnson, Bob. Mineral Rites: An Archeology of the Fossil Economy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/book.66176

Meillassoux, Quentin. After Finitude: An Essay on Necessity of Contingency. Translated by Ray Brassier. London: Continuum, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350252059

Murphy, Michelle. “Chemical Infrastructures of the St. Clair River.” In Toxicants, Health and Regulation since 1945, edited by Soraya Boudia and Nathalie Jas, 103–15. London: Pickering & Chatto, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315654645-6

Povinelli, Elizabeth A. Geontologies: A Requiem to Late Liberalism. Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822373810

Wilson, Ara. “The Infrastructure of Intimacy.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 41, 2 (2016): 247–80. doi: 10.1086/682919 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/682919

Downloads

Published

15.09.2022

How to Cite

Filipović, A. (2022). Speculative Virontology: Malevolent Infrastructure against the Design of Infrastructural Intimacy in Pulse. AM Journal of Art and Media Studies, (28), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i28.525