Between Impure and Pure: The Sketch for a History of Blotch

Milovan Novaković

Abstract


Throughout the history of Western painting the blotch often exposed its capacity to operate in seemingly opposite directions, to be simultaneously engaged in engendering material impurity and optical purity. While in earlier instances it mostly obtruded on the picture's integrity, with the rise of non-mimetic painting blotch became the main vehicle of purity and cohesion. However, its unstable and versatile nature is revealed in a vetero-testamentary passage, where the purity or impurity of blotch is measured according to whether it invades the whole or just a part of the infected surface. In this brief sketch, the bipolarity of painterly macchia is described by pointing to its predominantly blemishing function from the Renaissance to 18th century; to growing acceptance of its material and formless impurity, and its consequent purification during the formation of pictorial formalism; and finally, to its revived uncleanness in the artistic interventions of Marcel Duchamp and Andy Warhol. The survey ends with the conclusion that the being of blotch resides in its itinerant, ever-shifting character, and that our experience of it as pure or impure depends on its quantity and pervasiveness.

How to cite this article: Novaković, Milovan. "Between Impure and Pure: The Sketch for a History of Blotch.AM Journal of Art and Media Studies 25 (September 2021): 173-183. doi: 10.25038/am.v0i25.456

Article received: April 25, 2021; Article accepted: June 21, 2021; Published online: September 15, 2021; Original scholarly paper


Keywords


blotch; tzaraath; macchia; tache; pictorial impurity/purity; materiality/opticality; formalism; all-over painting.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Du Fresnoy, Charles Alphonse. The Art of Painting. Translated by William Mason. New York: Arno Press, 1969.

Gombrich, E. H. Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2000.

Harrison, Charles, Wood, Paul, Gaiger, Jason, eds. Art in Theory 1648–1815: An Anthology of Changing Ideas. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2000.

Harrison, Charles, Wood, Paul, Gaiger, Jason, eds. Art in Theory 1815–1900: An Anthology of Changing Ideas. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 1998.

Kelley, Jeff, ed. Allan Kaprow. Essays on the Blurring of Art and Life. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1993.

Kemp, Martin, ed. Leonardo on Art. Translated by Martin Kemp and Margaret Walker. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2001.

Kern, Ulrike. “The Origins of Broken Colours.” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 79 (2016): 183–211.

Kuntz, Paul Grimley. “The Art of Blotting.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 25, 1 (Autumn 1966): 93–104. doi: 10.2307/428889

Lebensztejn, Jean-Claude. Pissing Figures 1280–2014. Translated by Jeff Nagy. New York: David Zwirner Books, 2017.

Morgan, Robert C., ed. Clement Greenberg. Late Writings. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press, 2003.

O'Brian, John, ed. Clement Greenberg. The Collected Essays and Criticism: Modernism with a Vengeance, 1957–1969. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.

Reutersvärd, Oscar. “The Accentuated Brush Stroke of the Impressionists: The Debate concerning Decomposition in Impressionism.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 10, 3 (March 1952): 273–78. doi: 10.2307/426552

Ruskin, John. The Elements of Drawing. New York: Dover, 1971.

Sohm, Philip. “Maniera and the Absent Hand: Avoiding the Etymology of Style.” RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics 36 (Autumn 1999): 100–124. doi: 10.1086/resv36n1ms20167478

Suthor, Nicola. Rembrandt's Roughness. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2018.

Taine, Hippolyte. On Intelligence. Vol. II. Translated by T. D. Haye. New York: Henry Hold and Company, 1875.

Vasari, Giorgio. Le Vite de' più eccellenti pittori, scultori, e architettori. Tomo VII. Firenze: G. C. Sansoni, 1881.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i25.456

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 AM Journal of Art and Media Studies

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

The content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

AM Journal of Art and Media Studies ISSN 2217-9666 - printed, ISSN 2406-1654 - online, UDK 7.01:316.774

Contact: amjournal@outlook.com

Publisher: Faculty of Media and Communications, Singidunum University, Belgrade, Serbia

Indexed in: ERIH PLUSEBSCODOAJ, and in The List of Scientific Journals Categorization of Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of Republic of Serbia (M51-2019). Beginning with No. 12 2017, AM is indexed, abstracted and covered in Clarivate Analytics service ESCI.