Beyond Fetish and Animism: Interpretations of the Autonomy of Commodities

Authors

  • Ian Schuler University of the State of Rio de Janeiro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i29.562

Keywords:

fetish; animism; commodity; object; autonomy.

Abstract

In recent decades, part of the human sciences has been dedicated to rethinking the separations between subjects and objects, or, in another sense, between nature and culture. If, in part of the Western context, this separation guaranteed the ontological primacy of subjects, other strands of thought have sought to rediscover the interactions between subjects and objects, including finding ways to establish the conditions of autonomy of objects by themselves. In particular and turning to the cultural context and the production of objects in capitalist societies, we ask about the conditions of autonomy of commodities. Depending on the perspective we adopt, the commodity loses its economic attribute, reappearing with other constitutive meanings. In this paper, we trace a brief conceptual course about the separations between subjects and objects and the contemporary interpretations that intend to undo such separation. First, we start with Sigmund Freud’s critical comments about the animistic practices of indigenous people and Karl Marx’s comments about commodity fetishism. According to Peter Stallybrass (2009), Marx would not be antagonistic to the fetish as a possible cultural form, but solely a critic of the commodity fetish in capitalist societies. Losing its harmful character, the fetish reappears as a potential agent of relations between human and non-human bodies, according to Latour (2005). Finally, we speculate on the commodity-object to reactivate the interlacements between subjects and objects in contemporaneity.

Author Biography

Ian Schuler, University of the State of Rio de Janeiro

Ian Schuler, is a filmmaker, video artist and researcher. He holds a PhD in Visual Arts from the State University of Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) and Master in Communication from the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ).

References

Benjamin, Walter. “On language as such and on the language of man.” In Selected Writings, V. 1. 1913-1926, edited by Marcus Bullock and Michael W. Jennings, 62–74. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. 1997.

Bennett, Jane. “Systems and Things: On Vital Materialism and Object-Oriented Philosophy.” In The Non-Human Turn edited by Richard Grusin, 223–39. Minneapolis, London: University of Minnesota Press, 2015.

Coccia, Emanuelle. O bem nas coisas: a publicidade como discurso moral. Lisboa: Documenta; Sistema Solar e Fundação Carmona e Costa. 2016.

Descola, Philippe. Outras naturezas, outras culturas São Paulo: Editora 34, 2016.

Esposito, Roberto. As pessoas e as coisas. São Paulo: Rafael Copetti Editor, 2016.

Fischli, Peter, Weiss, David and Heiser, Jörg. “The Odd Couple.” Frieze 102 (2006) https://www.frieze.com/article/odd-couple.

Freud, Sigmund. Obras completas volume 11: totem e tabu, contribuição à história do movimento psicanalítico e outros textos (1912–1914). São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2012.

Freud, Sigmund. Obras completas, volume 17: Inibição, sintoma e angústia, o futuro de uma ilusão e outros textos (1926–1929). São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2014.

Kopenawa, Davi and Albert, Bruce. A Queda do céu – Palavras de um xamã yanomami. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2019.

Kopytoff, Igor. “A biografia cultural das coisas”. In A vida social das coisas: as mercadorias sob uma perspectiva cultural, edited by Arjun Appadurai, 89–121. Niteroi: Ed. da Universidade Federal Fluminense, 2008.

Krenak, Ailton. Ideias para adiar o fim do mundo. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2020.

Latour, Bruno. Reflexão sobre o culto moderno dos deuses fe(i)tiches. Santa Catarina: EDUSC: 2002.

Marx, Karl. O capital: critica da economia politica. Volume 1, Livro Primeiro: O Processo de Produção do Capital. São Paulo: Nova Cultura, 1996.

Pires, Rogério Brittes W. “Fetichismo religioso, fetichismo da mercadoria, fetichismo sexual: transposições e conexões”. Revista de Antropologia 57, 1 (2014): 347–91. https://doi.org/10.11606/2179-0892.ra.2014.87763

Salgado, Tiago Barcelos Pereira. “A virada não humana na comunicação”. Bezerra, J., & Gonçalo, P. Realismo especulativo. Revista ECO-Pós, 21, 2 (2018): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.29146/eco-pos.v21i2.20510

Sansi, Roger. “Feitiço e fetiche no Atlântico moderno”. Revista de Antropologia 51, 1 (2008): 123–53. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-77012008000100005

Stallybrass, Peter. O casaco de Marx: roupa, memória, dor. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica Editora, 2008.

Steyerl, Hito. “The language of things.” Transversal 06/06: Under Translation (2006): 1–6.

Taussig, Michael. O diabo e o fetichismo da mercadoria na América do Sul. São Paulo: Editora Unesp, 2010.

Downloads

Published

30.04.2023

How to Cite

Schuler, I. (2023). Beyond Fetish and Animism: Interpretations of the Autonomy of Commodities. AM Journal of Art and Media Studies, (30), 219–229. https://doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i29.562