Extensive Exploration of The Preference Correlations Between Architectural Features and Musical Attributes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i28.568Abstract
This study investigates the correlations between empirically-based preferences for architectural features and self-reported preferences for musical attributes. Altogether, 16 architectural attributes related to architectural complexity, indentation, symmetry, rhythm, pattern, and stress and 36 musical attributes of genres, perceived psychological attributes, Five Factors of Music, and 3-Factors are considered in the study, and their correlations are examined across 61 different demographic classes. In short, after gathering the data, Pearson’s correlation coefficient analysis examined the existence of correlation, and Bonferroni correction screened the most reliable ones. Then, categorization and K-mean clustering methods summarized the outcomes to provide a holistic understanding of the discovered correlations. The former reflected a higher number of correlations within genre and FFM in music, and indentation, complexity, and symmetry in architecture. The latter presented interesting correlation trends, including between complicated music and complicated architecture, rap music and the existence of pattern in architecture, and mellow music and simple architectural forms.
References
Akalin, Aysu, Kemal Yildirim, Christopher Wilson, and Onder Kilicoglu. “Architecture and Engineering Students’ Evaluations of House Façades: Preference, Complexity and Impressiveness.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 29, 1 (2009): 124–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.05.005
Baker, Thomas J. “Integritas: Modern Relationships between Music and Architecture /.” University of Washington, Ann Arbor, 1996. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/34793557_Integritas_modern_relationships_between_music_and_architecture. Accessed on August 26, 2024.
Bandur, Markus. Aesthetics of Total Serialism: Contemporary Research from Music to Architecture. Basel; Boston; Berlin: Birkhäuser, 2001.
Bar, Moshe, and Maital Neta. “Humans Prefer Curved Visual Objects.” Psychological Science 17, 8 (2006): 645–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01759.x
Barnstone, Deborah Ascher. “Willem Marinus Dudok: The Lyrical Music of Architecture.” The Journal of Architecture 20, 2 (2015): 169–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2015.1025812
Brown, Brenda J. “Music, Landscape Architecture, and the Stuff of Landscapes.” In CENTER 18: Music in Architecture – Architecture in Music, edited by Michael Benedikt, 152–67. Austin, Texas: Center for American Architecture and Design, 2014.
Çakırlar, Yasemin Burcu. “Factors Affecting Evaluations of Storefront Designs and Inference on Store Characteristics.” Bilkent University, 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/11693/15093. Accessed on August 26, 2024.
Fowler, Michael. Architectures of Sound: Acoustic Concepts and Parameters for Architectural Design. Basel: Birkhäuser, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783035613292
Geringer, John M. “Musicians’ Preferences for Tempo and Pitch Levels in Recorded Orchestral Music.” Journal of Research in Music Education 58, 3 (2010): 294–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429410380464 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429410380464
Gordon, Josh, and Mark C. Gridley. “Musical Preferences as a Function of Stimulus Complexity of Piano Jazz.” Creativity Research Journal 25, 1 (2013): 143–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2013.752303 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2013.752303
Greasley, Alinka E., and Alexandra M. Lamont. “Music Preference in Adulthood: Why Do We like the Music We Do.” In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition, 960–66. Citeseer, 2006.
Greenberg, David M., Michal Kosinski, David J. Stillwell, Brian L. Monteiro, Daniel J. Levitin, and Peter J. Rentfrow. “The Song Is You: Preferences for Musical Attribute Dimensions Reflect Personality.” Social Psychological and Personality Science 7, 6 (May 9, 2016): 597–605. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616641473 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616641473
Herzog, Thomas R., and Ronda L. Shier. “Complexity, Age, and Building Preference.” Environment and Behavior 32, 4 (July 1, 2000): 557–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160021972667 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160021972667
Humphrey, Keith G., and Diane E. Humphrey. “The Role of Structure in Infant Visual Pattern Perception.” Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie 43, 2 (1989): 165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0084218
Husain, Gabriela, William Forde Thompson, and Glenn E. Schellenberg. “Effects of Musical Tempo and Mode on Arousal, Mood, and Spatial Abilities.” Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal 20, 2 (2002): 151–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2002.20.2.151
Imaah, Napoleon Ono. “Music: A Source of Inspiration and Harmony in Architecture: An African View.” International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music 35, 2 (2004): 169–82.
Imamoglu, Çagri. “Complexity, Liking and Familiarity: Architecture and Non-Architecture Turkish Students’ Assessments of Traditional and Modern House Facades.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 20, 1 (2000): 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1999.0155 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1999.0155
Kilicaslan, Hare, and Isik Ece Tezgel. “Architecture and Music in the Baroque Period.” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 51 (2012): 635–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.215 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.215
Lippens, Stefaan, Jean-Pierre Martens, and Tom De Mulder. “A Comparison of Human and Automatic Musical Genre Classification.” In 2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 4: iv–iv. IEEE, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2004.1326806
McKay, Cory, and Ichiro Fujinaga. “Musical Genre Classification: Is It Worth Pursuing and How Can It Be Improved?” In ISMIR, 101–6, 2006.
North, Adrian, and David Hargreaves. The Social and Applied Psychology of Music. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198567424.001.0001
Rentfrow, Peter J., Lewis R. Goldberg, and Daniel J. Levitin. “The Structure of Musical Preferences: A Five-Factor Model.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 100, 6 (June 2011): 1139–57. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022406 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022406
Rentfrow, Peter J., and Samuel D. Gosling. “The Do Re Mi’s of Everyday Life: The Structure and Personality Correlates of Music Preferences.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84, 6 (2003): 1236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.6.1236
Schäfer, Thomas, and Peter Sedlmeier. “From the Functions of Music to Music Preference.” Psychology of Music 37, 3 (2009): 279–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735608097247 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735608097247
Schellenberg, Glenn E., and Peter Habashi. “Remembering the Melody and Timbre, Forgetting the Key and Tempo.” Memory & Cognition 43, 7 (2015): 1021–31. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-015-0519-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-015-0519-1
Silvera, David H., Robert A. Josephs, and Brian R. Giesler. “Bigger Is Better: The Influence of Physical Size on Aesthetic Preference Judgments.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 15, 3 (2002): 189–202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.410
Silvia, Paul J., and Christopher M. Barona. “Do People Prefer Curved Objects? Angularity, Expertise, and Aesthetic Preference.” Empirical Studies of the Arts 27, 1 (2009): 25–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2190/EM.27.1.b
Tayyebi, Seyed Farhad, and Yüksel Demir. “Architectural Composition: A Systematic Method to Define a List of Visual Attributes.” Art and Design Review 7, 3 (2019): 131–44. https://doi.org/10.4236/adr.2019.73012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/adr.2019.73012
Tayyebi, Seyed Farhad, and Yüksel Demir. “Correlations between Architectural and Musical Attributes.” Harvard Dataverse, 2021. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/P9I6YN
Tayyebi, Seyed Farhad, and Yüksel Demir. “Extracting Personal Preferences for Architectural Attributes: Examining the Reliability of Several Direct and Indirect Questioning Methods.” AM Journal of Art and Media Studies 22 (2020): 111–34. https://doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i22.381 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i22.381
Tayyebi, Seyed Farhad, and Yüksel Demir. “Musical Preferences Correlate Architectural Tastes: An Initial Investigation of the Correlations Between the Preferred Attributes.” Advanced Journal of Social Science 7, 1 (2020): 96–108. https://doi.org/10.21467/ajss.7.1.96-108 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21467/ajss.7.1.96-108
Tayyebi, Seyed Farhad, and Yuksel Demir. “Musical Preferences Correlate Architectural Tastes: Preference Correlations between Architectural Material Features and Musical Instruments.” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews June 6 (2022): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2022.2081017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2022.2081017
Tayyebi, Seyed Farhad, Yüksel Demir, Mehmet Nemutlu, and Can Karadoğan. “Graphical Layout of the Musical Preferences Studies: An Overview on How the Studies on Musical Tastes Are Conducted.” Art and Design Review 8, 1 (2020): 6–30. https://doi.org/10.4236/adr.2020.81002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/adr.2020.81002
Tinio, Pablo P. L., and Helmut Leder. “Just How Stable Are Stable Aesthetic Features? Symmetry, Complexity, and the Jaws of Massive Familiarization.” Acta Psychologica 130, 3 (2009): 241–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.01.001
Veal, Michael E. “Warps, Ribbons, Crumpled Surfaces, and Superimposed Shapes: Surfing the Contours of Miles Davis’s ‘Lost Quintet.’” In CENTER 18: Music in Architecture – Architecture in Music, edited by Michael Benedikt, 32–41. Austin, Texas: Center for American Architecture and Design, 2014.
Whittington, Stephen. “Digging in John Cage’s Garden: Cage and Ryōanji.” Malaysian Journal of Music 2, 2 (2013): 12–21.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 AM Journal of Art and Media Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
AM Journal of Art and Media Studies ISSN 2217-9666 - printed, ISSN 2406-1654 - online, UDK 7.01:316.774
Contact: amjournal@outlook.com
Publisher: Faculty of Media and Communications, Singidunum University, Belgrade, Serbia
Indexed in: ERIH PLUS, EBSCO, DOAJ, and in The List of Scientific Journals Categorization of Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of Republic of Serbia (M24 in 2021; M23 in 2023). Beginning with No. 12 2017, AM is indexed, abstracted and covered in Clarivate Analytics service ESCI.