Extensive Exploration of The Preference Correlations Between Architectural Features and Musical Attributes

Authors

  • Seyed Farhad Tayyebi Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Yuksel Demir Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i28.568

Abstract

This study investigates the correlations between empirically-based preferences for architectural features and self-reported preferences for musical attributes. Altogether, 16 architectural attributes related to architectural complexity, indentation, symmetry, rhythm, pattern, and stress and 36 musical attributes of genres, perceived psychological attributes, Five Factors of Music, and 3-Factors are considered in the study, and their correlations are examined across 61 different demographic classes. In short, after gathering the data, Pearson’s correlation coefficient analysis examined the existence of correlation, and Bonferroni correction screened the most reliable ones. Then, categorization and K-mean clustering methods summarized the outcomes to provide a holistic understanding of the discovered correlations. The former reflected a higher number of correlations within genre and FFM in music, and indentation, complexity, and symmetry in architecture. The latter presented interesting correlation trends, including between complicated music and complicated architecture, rap music and the existence of pattern in architecture, and mellow music and simple architectural forms.

Author Biographies

Seyed Farhad Tayyebi, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey

Seyed Farhad Tayyebi completed his PhD in Architectural Design Program, at Istanbul Technical University in 2021. During the years of his dissertation, he investigated the architectural composition features and extensively explored the correlations between the preferences of architectural and musical attributes. He also created a systematic and fully-objective method to transform a music sheet, as a representation of a musical piece, into an architectural form sculpture; thereby made an artistic bridge between the composition of architecture of music. Farhad got his architecture license in 2013, and has been working for years as an architect; his design won awards at several provincial and national architecture competitions.

Yuksel Demir, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey

Yuksel Demir studied architecture at Istanbul Technical University, Faculty of Architecture (1983-1987), obtained his MA (1990) and PhD (2000) degrees from the ITU Institute of Science & Technology Architectural Design Program. Yuuksel practiced architecture (1987–1989), worked as a teaching assistant (1989–2002), Assistant Prof (2002–2012), Associate Prof, and Professor in ITU Department of Architecture; he also served as the head of the department of Fine Arts in ITU (2007–2016), and currently is the head of the Department of Architecture at ITU. He took part in the development process of the interdisciplinary first year basic design studio at the ITU >Department of Architecture (2000–2004). Yuksel worked in Politecnico Di Milano DIAP (now DASTU) as a guest professor (2010–2015) and was a visiting professor at Anadolu University, Department of Architecture (2009–2013), and Auburn University CADC (2016 Fall and 2017 Fall).

References

Akalin, Aysu, Kemal Yildirim, Christopher Wilson, and Onder Kilicoglu. “Architecture and Engineering Students’ Evaluations of House Façades: Preference, Complexity and Impressiveness.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 29, 1 (2009): 124–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.05.005

Baker, Thomas J. “Integritas: Modern Relationships between Music and Architecture /.” University of Washington, Ann Arbor, 1996. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/34793557_Integritas_modern_relationships_between_music_and_architecture. Accessed on August 26, 2024.

Bandur, Markus. Aesthetics of Total Serialism: Contemporary Research from Music to Architecture. Basel; Boston; Berlin: Birkhäuser, 2001.

Bar, Moshe, and Maital Neta. “Humans Prefer Curved Visual Objects.” Psychological Science 17, 8 (2006): 645–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01759.x

Barnstone, Deborah Ascher. “Willem Marinus Dudok: The Lyrical Music of Architecture.” The Journal of Architecture 20, 2 (2015): 169–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2015.1025812

Brown, Brenda J. “Music, Landscape Architecture, and the Stuff of Landscapes.” In CENTER 18: Music in Architecture – Architecture in Music, edited by Michael Benedikt, 152–67. Austin, Texas: Center for American Architecture and Design, 2014.

Çakırlar, Yasemin Burcu. “Factors Affecting Evaluations of Storefront Designs and Inference on Store Characteristics.” Bilkent University, 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/11693/15093. Accessed on August 26, 2024.

Fowler, Michael. Architectures of Sound: Acoustic Concepts and Parameters for Architectural Design. Basel: Birkhäuser, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783035613292

Geringer, John M. “Musicians’ Preferences for Tempo and Pitch Levels in Recorded Orchestral Music.” Journal of Research in Music Education 58, 3 (2010): 294–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429410380464 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429410380464

Gordon, Josh, and Mark C. Gridley. “Musical Preferences as a Function of Stimulus Complexity of Piano Jazz.” Creativity Research Journal 25, 1 (2013): 143–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2013.752303 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2013.752303

Greasley, Alinka E., and Alexandra M. Lamont. “Music Preference in Adulthood: Why Do We like the Music We Do.” In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition, 960–66. Citeseer, 2006.

Greenberg, David M., Michal Kosinski, David J. Stillwell, Brian L. Monteiro, Daniel J. Levitin, and Peter J. Rentfrow. “The Song Is You: Preferences for Musical Attribute Dimensions Reflect Personality.” Social Psychological and Personality Science 7, 6 (May 9, 2016): 597–605. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616641473 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616641473

Herzog, Thomas R., and Ronda L. Shier. “Complexity, Age, and Building Preference.” Environment and Behavior 32, 4 (July 1, 2000): 557–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160021972667 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160021972667

Humphrey, Keith G., and Diane E. Humphrey. “The Role of Structure in Infant Visual Pattern Perception.” Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie 43, 2 (1989): 165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0084218

Husain, Gabriela, William Forde Thompson, and Glenn E. Schellenberg. “Effects of Musical Tempo and Mode on Arousal, Mood, and Spatial Abilities.” Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal 20, 2 (2002): 151–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2002.20.2.151

Imaah, Napoleon Ono. “Music: A Source of Inspiration and Harmony in Architecture: An African View.” International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music 35, 2 (2004): 169–82.

Imamoglu, Çagri. “Complexity, Liking and Familiarity: Architecture and Non-Architecture Turkish Students’ Assessments of Traditional and Modern House Facades.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 20, 1 (2000): 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1999.0155 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1999.0155

Kilicaslan, Hare, and Isik Ece Tezgel. “Architecture and Music in the Baroque Period.” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 51 (2012): 635–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.215 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.215

Lippens, Stefaan, Jean-Pierre Martens, and Tom De Mulder. “A Comparison of Human and Automatic Musical Genre Classification.” In 2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 4: iv–iv. IEEE, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2004.1326806

McKay, Cory, and Ichiro Fujinaga. “Musical Genre Classification: Is It Worth Pursuing and How Can It Be Improved?” In ISMIR, 101–6, 2006.

North, Adrian, and David Hargreaves. The Social and Applied Psychology of Music. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198567424.001.0001

Rentfrow, Peter J., Lewis R. Goldberg, and Daniel J. Levitin. “The Structure of Musical Preferences: A Five-Factor Model.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 100, 6 (June 2011): 1139–57. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022406 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022406

Rentfrow, Peter J., and Samuel D. Gosling. “The Do Re Mi’s of Everyday Life: The Structure and Personality Correlates of Music Preferences.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84, 6 (2003): 1236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.6.1236

Schäfer, Thomas, and Peter Sedlmeier. “From the Functions of Music to Music Preference.” Psychology of Music 37, 3 (2009): 279–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735608097247 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735608097247

Schellenberg, Glenn E., and Peter Habashi. “Remembering the Melody and Timbre, Forgetting the Key and Tempo.” Memory & Cognition 43, 7 (2015): 1021–31. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-015-0519-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-015-0519-1

Silvera, David H., Robert A. Josephs, and Brian R. Giesler. “Bigger Is Better: The Influence of Physical Size on Aesthetic Preference Judgments.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 15, 3 (2002): 189–202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.410

Silvia, Paul J., and Christopher M. Barona. “Do People Prefer Curved Objects? Angularity, Expertise, and Aesthetic Preference.” Empirical Studies of the Arts 27, 1 (2009): 25–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2190/EM.27.1.b

Tayyebi, Seyed Farhad, and Yüksel Demir. “Architectural Composition: A Systematic Method to Define a List of Visual Attributes.” Art and Design Review 7, 3 (2019): 131–44. https://doi.org/10.4236/adr.2019.73012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/adr.2019.73012

Tayyebi, Seyed Farhad, and Yüksel Demir. “Correlations between Architectural and Musical Attributes.” Harvard Dataverse, 2021. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/P9I6YN

Tayyebi, Seyed Farhad, and Yüksel Demir. “Extracting Personal Preferences for Architectural Attributes: Examining the Reliability of Several Direct and Indirect Questioning Methods.” AM Journal of Art and Media Studies 22 (2020): 111–34. https://doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i22.381 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i22.381

Tayyebi, Seyed Farhad, and Yüksel Demir. “Musical Preferences Correlate Architectural Tastes: An Initial Investigation of the Correlations Between the Preferred Attributes.” Advanced Journal of Social Science 7, 1 (2020): 96–108. https://doi.org/10.21467/ajss.7.1.96-108 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21467/ajss.7.1.96-108

Tayyebi, Seyed Farhad, and Yuksel Demir. “Musical Preferences Correlate Architectural Tastes: Preference Correlations between Architectural Material Features and Musical Instruments.” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews June 6 (2022): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2022.2081017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2022.2081017

Tayyebi, Seyed Farhad, Yüksel Demir, Mehmet Nemutlu, and Can Karadoğan. “Graphical Layout of the Musical Preferences Studies: An Overview on How the Studies on Musical Tastes Are Conducted.” Art and Design Review 8, 1 (2020): 6–30. https://doi.org/10.4236/adr.2020.81002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/adr.2020.81002

Tinio, Pablo P. L., and Helmut Leder. “Just How Stable Are Stable Aesthetic Features? Symmetry, Complexity, and the Jaws of Massive Familiarization.” Acta Psychologica 130, 3 (2009): 241–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.01.001

Veal, Michael E. “Warps, Ribbons, Crumpled Surfaces, and Superimposed Shapes: Surfing the Contours of Miles Davis’s ‘Lost Quintet.’” In CENTER 18: Music in Architecture – Architecture in Music, edited by Michael Benedikt, 32–41. Austin, Texas: Center for American Architecture and Design, 2014.

Whittington, Stephen. “Digging in John Cage’s Garden: Cage and Ryōanji.” Malaysian Journal of Music 2, 2 (2013): 12–21.

Downloads

Published

01.10.2024

How to Cite

Tayyebi, S. F., & Demir, Y. (2024). Extensive Exploration of The Preference Correlations Between Architectural Features and Musical Attributes. AM Journal of Art and Media Studies, (34), 115–142. https://doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i28.568