Political Power and Its Representation

Authors

  • Milan Radovanović Academy of Arts, Alfa BK University, Belgrade, Serbia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i28.603

Keywords:

representation; language; power; ruler; portrait.

Abstract

Understanding the concept of representation as a key factor involved in the process of meaning production in a society, can help us answer the following questions: what does the concept of representation mean in the context of constituting and producing political power, what does the process of representation entail, and how does it function? Our focus will be on the idea that political power is produced through regimes of verbal and visual representation that actively shape our perception of reality, including existing social norms and values. Representation is not only the result of certain social tendencies and changes, but also their instigator. The status of a ruler is determined not only based on their historical or social relevance, but also on how they are represented. In shaping the perception of a ruler as a legitimate holder of power, representation often plays a more dominant role than the subject itself. We will treat the concepts of power and representation as interdependent and interconnected variables. We will pay attention to how their reciprocal subordination produces two effects: the institution of power appropriates representation as something inherently its own, and representation is actually what transfers its power onto it.

Author Biography

Milan Radovanović, Academy of Arts, Alfa BK University, Belgrade, Serbia

Milan Radovanović. The doctoral dissertation Semiotic Theories of Reading Visual Art Texts, which he wrote under the mentorship of Prof. Dr. Miško Šuvaković, was defended within the scientific interdisciplinary studies of Art Theory and Media at the University of Arts in Belgrade. At the Academy of Arts in Belgrade, he teaches undergraduate courses in Art Theory and Media, Visual Literacy, Theories of Media Influence, and Aesthetics, while also teaching Methodology of Research Work at the master’s level. Milan serves as the faculty’s vice-dean for science. He is involved in creating new study programs and enhancing the teaching process at the faculty, which has been successfully accredited with top ratings and is recognized as one of the leading higher education institutions in Serbia. He is a reviewer for professional publications issued by the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, the University of Belgrade, the University of Novi Sad, the University of Niš, and others. As a theorist of art and media, he investigates the often-overlooked impact of Byzantine iconography's semiotics on contemporary art and popular culture.

References

Arnauld, Antoine, and Pierre Nicole. Logic or the Art of Thinking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

Belsey, Catherine. Critical Practice. London and New York: Routledge, 2005.

Berger, John. Ways of Seeing. London: Penguin, 2008.

Bryson, Norman. “Semiology and Visual Interpretation.” In Visual Theory: Painting and Interpretation, edited by Norman Bryson, Michael Ann Holly, and Keith Moxey, 61–73. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991.

Bryson, Norman. Word and Image – French painting of the Ancien Régime. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.

Danto, Arthur. “Depiction and Description.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research Vol. 43, No. 1 (September 1982): 1–19.

Foucault, Michel. “Truth and Power: an interview with Michel Foucault.” Critique of Anthropology 4 (13–14) (1979): 109–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X79004013

Goldschläger, Alain. “Towards a Semiotics of Authoritarian Discourse.” Poetics Today 3, 1 (1982): 11–20.

Hall, Stuart. “Encoding/decoding.” In Culture, Media, Language, edited by Stuart Hall, Dorothy Hobson, Andrew Lowe and Paul Willis, 117–27. New York, London: Routledge, 2005.

Hall, Stuart, ed. Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practises. London: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2013.

Marin, Louis. On Representation. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2001.

Marin, Louis. Portrait of the King. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1988.

Marin, Louis. Sublime Poussin. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1999.

Plato. The Statesman, Philebus, Ion, The Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1962.

Rietbergen, Peter. “The Political Rhetoric of Capitals: Rome and Versailles in the Baroque Period, or the Power of Place.” In New Perspectives on Power and Political Representation from Ancient History to the Present Day, edited by Harm Kaal and Danielle Slootjes, 56–77. Leiden, Boston: Brill, 2019.

Saussure, Ferdinand de. Course in General Linguistics. Translated by Wade Baskin. New York City: Columbia University Press, 2011.

Šuvaković, Miško. Pojmovnik moderne i postmoderne likovne umetnosti i teorije posle 1950. godine. Beograd, Novi Sad: Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti, Prometej, 1999.

Winter, Irene. “What/When Is a Portrait? Royal Images of the Ancient Near East.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 153, 3 (September 2009): 254–70.

Downloads

Published

15.10.2024

How to Cite

Radovanović, M. (2024). Political Power and Its Representation. AM Journal of Art and Media Studies, (35), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i28.603