Artificial Form of Life as the Discrimination Challenge for Education: Non-Human Intelligence and Schooling

Authors

  • Predrag Krstić Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, University of Belgrade, Serbia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i28.621

Keywords:

art, science; health; biopolitics; necropolitics; politics; ethics; forms of life; death.

Abstract

The paper thematizes contemporary moment of humanity’s self-understanding in the context of advanced technological development, by looking at it through the lens of (un)imaginability of artificial lifeform education. This perspective allows us to thematize the problem of discrimination in both of its meanings – how to distinguish the human form of life from others, in this case artificial forms of life, and how to ensure that this distinction does not serve as a basis for degradation – in order to argue for the suspension of human narcissism and suggest the possibility of their equality in access to education, and not only education. The first part presents the challenges artificial intelligence and especially androids represent to the traditional vision of the human, suggesting a necessity of its renewed examination and rearticulation in the style of critical posthumanism. The middle section differentiates two potential as well as typical reactions to the drama whose protagonists are humans and self-aware human-like robots, both of which arose from a fear of losing a recognizable human identity. It is concluded that, running parallel to changes in thinking humanity and the development of techno-science, there have been changes in approaches to humanity’s artificial Other and the (im)possibility of its education: from a fundamental rejection of such an idea that “soulless machines” might attend school, through a softened stance that autonomous automatons might be capable of learning, to allowing for the possibility that they even join humans in schools.

Author Biography

Predrag Krstić, Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, University of Belgrade, Serbia

Predrag Krstić (1964) is the research associate at the Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, University of Belgrade, and PhD Professor at the Faculty of Media and Communications, Singidunum University, Belgrade. He graduated from the Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade, where he also obtained his PhD in Philosophy. He had been employed as a professor of philosophy in secondary schools for thirteen years. Fields of his proficiency include critical theory, modern theory of the subject, philosophical anthropology, philosophy of Enlightenment and philosophy of education. Fields of his current professional interest includes contemporary philosophical, social, anthropological and educational theory, aesthetics, literary criticism, radical textual practices and popular culture studies. In addition to seventeen books and numerous articles, monographic studies and editorial contributions in academic publications, he is also the author of one novel and two books of poetry.

References

Adorno, Theodor W. Negative Dialektik. Gesammelte Schriften, Vol 6. Suhrkamp, 1997.

Bostrom, Nick. Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford University Press, 2014.

Braidotti, Rosi. The Posthuman. Polity Press, 2013.

Campbell, Murray, A. Joseph Hoane Jr., Fen-hsiung Hsu. “Deep Blue.” Artificial Intelligence 134, no. 1– 2 (2002): 57–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-3702(01)00129-1

Cook, Gareth. “Watson, the Computer Jeopardy! Champion and the Future of Artificial Intelligence.” Scientific American, March 1, 2011. Accessed May 11, 2023. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/watson-the-computer-jeopa/.

Cosmo, Leonardo De. “Google Engineer Claims AI Chatbot is Sentient: Why that Matters.” Scientific American (July 12, 2022). Accessed September 29, 2023. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/google-engineer-claims-ai-chatbot-is-sentient-why-that-matters/.

Felder, Richard M. and Rebecca Brent. “The Intellectual Development of Science and Engineering Students. Part 1. Models and Challenges.” Journal of Engineering Education 93, no. 4 (2004): 269–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00816.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00816.x

Fenwick, Tara and Richard Edwards. “Considering Materiality in Educational Policy: Messy Objects and Multiple Reals.” Educational Theory 61, no. 6 (2011): 709–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2011.00429.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2011.00429.x

Gimbel, Steven. “Get with the Program: Kasparov, Deep Blue, and Accusations of Unsportsthinglike Conduct.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 15, no. 2 (1998): 145–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5930.00082. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5930.00082

Gomel, Elana. “Science (Fiction) and Posthuman Ethics: Redefining the Human.” The European Legacy 16, no. 3 (2011): 339–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/10848770.2011.575597. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10848770.2011.575597

Graham, Elaine. “Post/Human Conditions.” Theology & Sexuality 10, no. 2 (2004): 10–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/135583580401000202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/135583580401000202

Grunwald, Armin. “Artificial Intelligence (AI) Meets Philosophical Anthropology.” Paper presented at the Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Belgrade, Serbia, September 29, 2022. Accessed February 7, 2023. https://ifdt.bg.ac.rs/events/lecture-armin-grunwald-artificial-intelligence-ai-meets-philosophical-anthropology-digilab/?lang=en.

Gwaltney, Marilyn. “Androids as a Device for Reflection on Personhood.” In Retrofitting Blade Runner: Issues in Ridley Scott's Blade Runner and Philip K. Dick's Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?, edited by Judith Kerman, 32–39. Bowling Green State University Popular Press, 1991.

Hall, Emily. “Locating Empathy: Using Android Protagonists to Teach Oppression and Marginalization.” Pedagogy 19, no. 3 (2019): 551–58. https://doi.org/10.1215/15314200-7615570. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/15314200-7615570

Harari, Yuval Noah. Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow. Vintage, 2017.

Haraway, Donna. “A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century.” In Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, 149–81. Routledge, 1991.

Hayles, Katherine N. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. University of Chicago Press, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226321394.001.0001

Heise, Ursula K. “The Android and the Animal.” PMLA 124, no. 2 (2009): 503–10. https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2009.124.2.503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2009.124.2.503

Himma, Kenneth Einar. “Artificial Agency, Consciousness and the Criteria for Moral Agency: What Properties Must an Artificial Agent Have to Be a Moral Agent?” Ethics and Information Technology 11 (2009): 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-008-9167-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-008-9167-5

Honneth, Axel. The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. The MIT Press, 1996.

Kant, Immanuel. Pädagogik (Kants gesammelten Schriften, Akademieausgabe, Vol. IX. Walter de Gruter, 1962.

Khalil, Hend. “Science Fiction Drama: Promoting Posthumanism.” CDELT Occasional Papers in the Development of English Education 66, no. 1 (2019): 447–62. https://doi.org/10.21608/opde.2019.133249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/opde.2019.133249

Krstić, Predrag and Srđan Prodanović. “Smurfs, Cyborgs and Changelings: Prospects of Human Enhancement Retrospected.” European Journal of Futures Research 1, no. 1 (2013): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40309-013-0021-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40309-013-0021-6

Krstić, Predrag. “Should Androids Go to School?” In Posthumanism and Education: Transgression or Interdependence, edited by Ivan Nišavić, Nevena Mitranić Marinković and Predrag Krstić. Transnational Press London, forthcoming.

Kurzweil, Ray. The Singularity is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. Viking, 2005.

LaGrandeur, Kevin. “Androids and the Posthuman in Television and Film.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Posthumanism in Film and Television, edited by Michael Hauskeller, Thomas D. Philbeck and Curtis D. Carbonell, 111–19. Palgrave Macmillan, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137430328_12

Loughnan, Stephen and Nick Haslam. “Animals and Androids: Implicit Associations Between Social Categories and Nonhumans.” Psychological Science 18, no. 2 (2007): 116–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01858.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01858.x

Menzel, Peter and Faith D’Aluisio. Robo Sapiens: Evolution of a New Species. The MIT Press, 2000.

Misselhorn, Catrin. “Artificial Morality. Concepts, Issues and Challenges.” Society 55, no. 2 (2018): 161–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-018-0229-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-018-0229-y

Moravec, Hans. Mind Children: The Future of Robot and Human Intelligence. Harvard University Press, 1990.

More, Max. “The Philosophy of Transhumanism.” In The Transhumanist Reader: Classical and Contemporary Essays on the Science, Technology, and Philosophy of the Human Future, edited by Max More and Natasha Vita-More, 1–17. Wiley-Blackwell, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118555927.ch1

Neuwirth, Manuela. “‘Absolute Alterity’? The Alien Animal, the Human Alien, and the Limits of Posthumanism in Star Trek.” European Journal of American Studies [Online] 13, no. 1 (2018): 1–20. Accessed June 11, 2024. https://journals.openedition.org/ejas/12464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/ejas.12464

Odorčák, Juraj and Pavlína Bakošová. “Robots, Extinction, and Salvation: On Altruism in Human–Posthuman Interactions.” Religions 275, no. 12 (2021). Accessed January 2, 2024. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350990123_Robots_Extinction_and_Salvation_On_Altruism_in_Human-Posthuman_Interactions. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12040275

Podschwadek, Frodo. “Do Androids Dream of Normative Endorsement? On the Fallibility of Artificial Moral Agents.” Artificial Intelligence and Law 25, no. 3 (2017): 325–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-017-9209-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-017-9209-6

Pordzik, Ralph. “The Posthuman Future of Man: Anthropocentrism and the Other of Technology in Anglo-American Science Fiction.” Utopian Studies 23, no. 1 (2012): 142–61. https://doi.org/10.5325/utopianstudies.23.1.0142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5325/utopianstudies.23.1.0142

Relke, Diana M. A. Drones, Clones, and Alpha Babes: Retrofitting Star Trek’s Humanism, Post-9/11. University of Calgary Press, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781552383308

Russell, Stuart J. and Peter Norvig. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Prentice Hall, 2010.

Sartr, Žan-Pol. Filozofski spisi. Nolit, 1981.

Searle, John. Consciousness and Language. Cambridge University Press, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511606366

Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft. Frankenstein, or, The Modern Prometheus. University of Chicago Press., 1982 (1818). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226623986.001.0001

Short, Sue. “The Measure of a Man? Asimov’s Bicentennial Man, Star Trek’s Data, and Being Human.” Extrapolation 44, no. 2 (2003): 209–24. https://doi.org/10.3828/extr.2003.44.2.6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/extr.2003.44.2.6

Smith, David Livingstone. Less than Human: Why We Demean, Enslave, and Exterminate Others. St. Martin’s Press, 2011.

Sorkin, Andrew Ross. “Interview with the Lifelike Hot Robot Named Sophia.” YouTube. CNBC. October 25, 2017. Accessed June 6, 2024. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5t6K9iwcdw.

Watson, Timothy. “The Apocalypse for Androids: How Humans Create Dystopia for A.I.” Film Matters 9, no. 3 (2018): 147–54. https://doi.org/10.1386/fm.9.3.147_1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1386/fm.9.3.147_1

Published

15.04.2025

How to Cite

Krstić, P. (2025). Artificial Form of Life as the Discrimination Challenge for Education: Non-Human Intelligence and Schooling. AM Journal of Art and Media Studies, (36). https://doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i28.621

Issue

Section

MAIN TOPIC: Critical Theory, Media, and Education in the Era of Artificial Intelligence