Mediatization and Neoliberalism: Critical Conceptualization of Media Populism

Nikola Mlađenović; Slobodan Penezić

doi:10.25038/am.v0i28.622

Authors

Nikola Mlađenović Faculty of Sport, University “Union – Nikola Tesla”, Belgrade, Serbia
Slobodan Penezić Institute of Social Sciences, Belgrade, Serbia; Faculty of Sport, University “Union – Nikola Tesla”, Belgrade, Serbia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i28.622

Keywords:

populism; mediatization; neoliberalism; media populism; media logic.

Abstract

This paper reconstructs the critical deficit of media populism research. Mediatization of politics is defined as the interplay between political and media logic, but researchers rarely examine all three constituents of political logic (polity, policy, politics). The paper dissects the media within the whole social system and introduces the interplay of polity/policy, media and economic logic. It argues that the media populism research is based thoroughly on the differentiation paradigm. Therefore, it introduces Hallin and Mancini’s “shift toward neoliberalism” as a simultaneous process of differentiation and dedifferentiation and proposes networked understanding of populism. Neoliberal polity/policies are considered as conditions for the rise of populism. On the other hand, decrease in audience trust brought the rise of partisan and social media. It networked the populism today, literally.

Author Biographies

Nikola Mlađenović, Faculty of Sport, University “Union – Nikola Tesla”, Belgrade, Serbia

Nikola Mlađenović holds a PhD in Cultural and Media Studies awarded by the Faculty of Political Sciences at the University of Belgrade (Serbia). Currently, he is an Assistant Professor at the Faculty of Sport, Union – Nikola Tesla University (Belgrade), and a guest lecturer at the UDG Montenegro (ASU Cintana Alliance network). His work is focused on the examination of the relationship between social theory and cybernetics, on the one hand, and media culture, on the other hand. He is concerned with political significance and social engagement within media system and popular culture. His last contribution examines the Russia–United States culture war within Serbian media system in a paper titled “Russian roulette: Serbian pop culture and global soft-power conflict” (Northern Lights: Film & Media Studies Yearbook). Currently, he is working on the influence of cybernetics in James Cameron’s science fiction films (upcoming book edited by Mark Fryers and Marcus Harmes).

Slobodan Penezić, Institute of Social Sciences, Belgrade, Serbia; Faculty of Sport, University “Union – Nikola Tesla”, Belgrade, Serbia

Slobodan Penezić holds a PhD in Cultural and Media Studies awarded by the Faculty of Political Sciences at the University of Belgrade (Serbia). Currently, he is a Research Associate at Institute of Social Sciences (Belgrade) and Associate Professor at the Faculty of Sport, Union – Nikola Tesla University (Belgrade), where he is also a Head of the Department of Journalism. His work is mainly focused on the studies of Journalism, Media Philosophy and Business, Social History of Sport and Mediatization of Sport, and Public Relations. He is a recipient of a special award from the Association of Journalists of Serbia for contributions to the history of print and journalism, theoretical works on journalism, and published works, and the award of the U.S. Department of State and Voice of America for winners of a competition for the best young media professionals from Southeast Europe.

References

“Introduction. Fading of a Dream?” In Europe’s Crises, edited Gustavo Cardoso, Joao Caraça, John Thompson, Manuel Castells, Michel Wieviorka, and Olivier Bouin, 1–10. Polity Press, 2018.

Anderson, Perry. The New Old World. Verso, 2011.

Balibar, Etienne. Citizenship. Polity, 2015.

Bauman, Zygmunt and Carlo Bordoni. State of Crisis. Polity, 2014.

Beck, Ulrich. German Europe. Polity, 2013.

Bonefeld, Werner. Strong State and the Free Economy. Rowman and Littlefield, 2017.

Couldry, Nick. “Mediatization and the Future of Field Theory.” In Mediatization of Communication, edited Knut Lundby, 227–49. De Gruyter, 2014.

Cvejić, Bojan. “’Crna hronika’ i etika u štampi u Srbiji pre 100 godina i danas.” CM: Communication and Media 19, no. 2 (2024): 367–90. https://doi.org/10.5937/cm19-49941.

Farrant, Andrew, Edward McPhail, and Sebastian Berger. “Preventing the ‘Abuses’ of Democracy: Hayek, the ‘Military Usurper’ and Transitional Dictatorship in Chile?”.

American Journal of Economics and Sociology 71 no. 3 (2012): 513–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.2012.00824.x.

Friedman, Milton. “Neoliberalism and its Prospects.” Farmand 17 (1951): 89–93.

Friedman, Milton. Capitalism and Freedom. University of Chicago Press, 1982.

Giddens, Anthony. Turbulent and Mighty Continent: What Future for Europe? Polity, 2014.

Grossberg, Lawrence. “Language and Theorizing in the Human Sciences.” In Studies in Symbolic Interaction (2), edited Norman K. Denzin, 189–231. JAI Press inc., 1979.

Grossberg, Lawrence. “Strategies of Marxist Cultural Interpretation.” Critical Studies in Mass Communication 1 no. 4 (1984): 392–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295038409360049.

Habermas, Jurgen. The Crisis of the European Union (Polity, 2012).

Habermas, Jurgen. The Lure of Technocracy (Polity, 2015).

Habermas, Jurgen. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. MIT Press, 1989.

Hallin, Daniel, and Paolo Mancini. Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge University Press, 2004.

Hallin, Daniel. “Mediatization, Neoliberalism and Populisms: the Case of Trump.” Contemporary Social Science (2018): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2018.1426404.

Hayek, Friedrich. Law, Legislation and Liberty (3 volumes). Routledge, 1998.

Hepp, Andreas, Stig Hjarvard, and Knut Lundby. “Mediatization: Theorizing the Interplay between Media, Culture and Society.” Media, Culture and Society 37 (2015): 314–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443715573835.

Hicks, John Donald. The Populist Revolt: A History of the Farmers’ Alliance and the People’s Party. The University of Minnesota Press, 1955.

Hjarvard, Stig. (2014). “Mediatization and Cultural and Social Change: an Institutional Perspective.” In Mediatization of Communication, edited Knut Lundby, 199–227. De Gruyter, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110272215.199.

Horkheimer, Max, and Theodor Adorno. Dialectic of Enlightenment. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002.

Judis, John B. The Populist Explosion. Columbia Global Reports, 2016.

Krämer, Benjamin. “Media Populism: A Conceptual Clarification and Some Theses on its Effects.” Communication Theory 24, (2014): 42–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12029.

Laclau, Ernesto. On Populist Reason. Verso, 2005.

Lazarsfeld, Paul. “Remarks on Administrative and Critical Communications Research.” Studies in Philosophy and Social Science 9 (1941): 2–16.

Mazzoleni, Gianpietro. “Mediatization and Political Populism.” In Mediatization of Politics: Understanding the Transformation of Western Democracies, edited Frank Esser and Jesper Strömbäck, 42–56. Palgrave MacMillan, 2014.

Mazzoleni, Gianpietro. “Populism and the Media.” In Twenty˗First Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European Democracy, edited Daniele Albertazzi and Duncan McDonnell, 49–64. Palgrave MacMillan, 2008.

Penezić, Slobodan and Goran Kauzlarić. “Neoliberalna epistemologija i konceptualne promene u medijskom posredovanju.” LIMES Plus: Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 1 (2024): 83–117. http://iriss.idn.org.rs/2597/1/SP-txt-Limes-2024.pdf.

Peruško, Zrinjka. “Mediatization: From Structure to Agency (and Back Again).” In Dynamics of Mediatization: Institutional Change and Everyday Transformations in a Digital Age, edited Olivier Driessens, Andreas Hepp, Stig Hjarvard, and Goran Bolin, 57-85. Palgrave, 2017.

Ruben, Brent D. “Intrapersonal, Interpersonal, and Mass Communication Processes in Individual and Multi-Person Systems.” In General Systems Theory and Human Communication, edited Brent D. Ruben, and John Y. Kim, 164–85. Hayden Book Co., 1975.

Schmitt, Carl. Dictatorship. Polity, 2014.

Self, C. Charles. “Lecture 1–3.” In Study Guide for Mass Comm Theory, edited Charles C. Self, 2–21. University of Oklahoma, 2008.

Streeck, Wolfgang. “The Crises of Democratic Capitalism.” New Left Review 71 (2011): 5–29.

Streeck, Wolfgang. “The Return of the Repressed.” New Left Review 104 (2017): 5–18.

Strömbäck, Jesper and Frank Esser. “Mediatization of Politics: Towards a Theoretical Framework.” In Mediatization of Politics: Understanding the Transformation of Western Democracies, edited Frank Esser, and Jesper Strömbäck, 3-31. Palgrave MacMillan, 2014.

Van Aelst, Peter, Jesper Strömbäck, Toril Aalberg, Frank Esser, Claes de Vreese, Jörg Matthes, David Hopmann, et al. “Political Communication in a High˗Choice Media Environment: a Challenge for Democracy?” Annals of the International Communication Association 41, no. 1 (2017): 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2017.1288551.

Vitković, Biljana. “Učešće mladih u medijima i analiza prelivanja informacija o njima od jedne ka drugoj vrsti medija.” CM: Communication and Media 18, no. 54 (2023): 305–36. https://doi.org/10.5937/cm18-43849

von Mises, Ludwig. Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. Fox and Wilkes, 1996.

von Mises, Ludwing. Liberalism in the Classical Tradition. Cobden Press, 1985.

Mediatization and Neoliberalism: Critical Conceptualization of Media Populism

Authors

DOI:

Keywords:

Abstract

Author Biographies

Nikola Mlađenović, Faculty of Sport, University “Union – Nikola Tesla”, Belgrade, Serbia

Slobodan Penezić, Institute of Social Sciences, Belgrade, Serbia; Faculty of Sport, University “Union – Nikola Tesla”, Belgrade, Serbia

References

Downloads

Published

How to Cite

Issue

Section

License