Mediatization and Neoliberalism: Critical Conceptualization of Media Populism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i28.622Keywords:
populism; mediatization; neoliberalism; media populism; media logic.Abstract
This paper reconstructs the critical deficit of media populism research. Mediatization of politics is defined as the interplay between political and media logic, but researchers rarely examine all three constituents of political logic (polity, policy, politics). The paper dissects the media within the whole social system and introduces the interplay of polity/policy, media and economic logic. It argues that the media populism research is based thoroughly on the differentiation paradigm. Therefore, it introduces Hallin and Mancini’s “shift toward neoliberalism” as a simultaneous process of differentiation and dedifferentiation and proposes networked understanding of populism. Neoliberal polity/policies are considered as conditions for the rise of populism. On the other hand, decrease in audience trust brought the rise of partisan and social media. It networked the populism today, literally.
References
“Introduction. Fading of a Dream?” In Europe’s Crises, edited Gustavo Cardoso, Joao Caraça, John Thompson, Manuel Castells, Michel Wieviorka, and Olivier Bouin, 1–10. Polity Press, 2018.
Anderson, Perry. The New Old World. Verso, 2011.
Balibar, Etienne. Citizenship. Polity, 2015.
Bauman, Zygmunt and Carlo Bordoni. State of Crisis. Polity, 2014.
Beck, Ulrich. German Europe. Polity, 2013.
Bonefeld, Werner. Strong State and the Free Economy. Rowman and Littlefield, 2017.
Couldry, Nick. “Mediatization and the Future of Field Theory.” In Mediatization of Communication, edited Knut Lundby, 227–49. De Gruyter, 2014.
Cvejić, Bojan. “’Crna hronika’ i etika u štampi u Srbiji pre 100 godina i danas.” CM: Communication and Media 19, no. 2 (2024): 367–90. https://doi.org/10.5937/cm19-49941.
Farrant, Andrew, Edward McPhail, and Sebastian Berger. “Preventing the ‘Abuses’ of Democracy: Hayek, the ‘Military Usurper’ and Transitional Dictatorship in Chile?”.
American Journal of Economics and Sociology 71 no. 3 (2012): 513–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.2012.00824.x.
Friedman, Milton. “Neoliberalism and its Prospects.” Farmand 17 (1951): 89–93.
Friedman, Milton. Capitalism and Freedom. University of Chicago Press, 1982.
Giddens, Anthony. Turbulent and Mighty Continent: What Future for Europe? Polity, 2014.
Grossberg, Lawrence. “Language and Theorizing in the Human Sciences.” In Studies in Symbolic Interaction (2), edited Norman K. Denzin, 189–231. JAI Press inc., 1979.
Grossberg, Lawrence. “Strategies of Marxist Cultural Interpretation.” Critical Studies in Mass Communication 1 no. 4 (1984): 392–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295038409360049.
Habermas, Jurgen. The Crisis of the European Union (Polity, 2012).
Habermas, Jurgen. The Lure of Technocracy (Polity, 2015).
Habermas, Jurgen. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. MIT Press, 1989.
Hallin, Daniel, and Paolo Mancini. Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge University Press, 2004.
Hallin, Daniel. “Mediatization, Neoliberalism and Populisms: the Case of Trump.” Contemporary Social Science (2018): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2018.1426404.
Hayek, Friedrich. Law, Legislation and Liberty (3 volumes). Routledge, 1998.
Hepp, Andreas, Stig Hjarvard, and Knut Lundby. “Mediatization: Theorizing the Interplay between Media, Culture and Society.” Media, Culture and Society 37 (2015): 314–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443715573835.
Hicks, John Donald. The Populist Revolt: A History of the Farmers’ Alliance and the People’s Party. The University of Minnesota Press, 1955.
Hjarvard, Stig. (2014). “Mediatization and Cultural and Social Change: an Institutional Perspective.” In Mediatization of Communication, edited Knut Lundby, 199–227. De Gruyter, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110272215.199.
Horkheimer, Max, and Theodor Adorno. Dialectic of Enlightenment. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002.
Judis, John B. The Populist Explosion. Columbia Global Reports, 2016.
Krämer, Benjamin. “Media Populism: A Conceptual Clarification and Some Theses on its Effects.” Communication Theory 24, (2014): 42–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12029.
Laclau, Ernesto. On Populist Reason. Verso, 2005.
Lazarsfeld, Paul. “Remarks on Administrative and Critical Communications Research.” Studies in Philosophy and Social Science 9 (1941): 2–16.
Mazzoleni, Gianpietro. “Mediatization and Political Populism.” In Mediatization of Politics: Understanding the Transformation of Western Democracies, edited Frank Esser and Jesper Strömbäck, 42–56. Palgrave MacMillan, 2014.
Mazzoleni, Gianpietro. “Populism and the Media.” In Twenty˗First Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European Democracy, edited Daniele Albertazzi and Duncan McDonnell, 49–64. Palgrave MacMillan, 2008.
Penezić, Slobodan and Goran Kauzlarić. “Neoliberalna epistemologija i konceptualne promene u medijskom posredovanju.” LIMES Plus: Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 1 (2024): 83–117. http://iriss.idn.org.rs/2597/1/SP-txt-Limes-2024.pdf.
Peruško, Zrinjka. “Mediatization: From Structure to Agency (and Back Again).” In Dynamics of Mediatization: Institutional Change and Everyday Transformations in a Digital Age, edited Olivier Driessens, Andreas Hepp, Stig Hjarvard, and Goran Bolin, 57-85. Palgrave, 2017.
Ruben, Brent D. “Intrapersonal, Interpersonal, and Mass Communication Processes in Individual and Multi-Person Systems.” In General Systems Theory and Human Communication, edited Brent D. Ruben, and John Y. Kim, 164–85. Hayden Book Co., 1975.
Schmitt, Carl. Dictatorship. Polity, 2014.
Self, C. Charles. “Lecture 1–3.” In Study Guide for Mass Comm Theory, edited Charles C. Self, 2–21. University of Oklahoma, 2008.
Streeck, Wolfgang. “The Crises of Democratic Capitalism.” New Left Review 71 (2011): 5–29.
Streeck, Wolfgang. “The Return of the Repressed.” New Left Review 104 (2017): 5–18.
Strömbäck, Jesper and Frank Esser. “Mediatization of Politics: Towards a Theoretical Framework.” In Mediatization of Politics: Understanding the Transformation of Western Democracies, edited Frank Esser, and Jesper Strömbäck, 3-31. Palgrave MacMillan, 2014.
Van Aelst, Peter, Jesper Strömbäck, Toril Aalberg, Frank Esser, Claes de Vreese, Jörg Matthes, David Hopmann, et al. “Political Communication in a High˗Choice Media Environment: a Challenge for Democracy?” Annals of the International Communication Association 41, no. 1 (2017): 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2017.1288551.
Vitković, Biljana. “Učešće mladih u medijima i analiza prelivanja informacija o njima od jedne ka drugoj vrsti medija.” CM: Communication and Media 18, no. 54 (2023): 305–36. https://doi.org/10.5937/cm18-43849
von Mises, Ludwig. Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. Fox and Wilkes, 1996.
von Mises, Ludwing. Liberalism in the Classical Tradition. Cobden Press, 1985.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 AM Journal of Art and Media Studies

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
AM Journal of Art and Media Studies ISSN 2217-9666 - printed, ISSN 2406-1654 - online, UDK 7.01:316.774
Contact: amjournal@outlook.com
Publisher: Faculty of Media and Communications, Singidunum University, Belgrade, Serbia
Indexed in: ERIH PLUS, EBSCO, DOAJ, and in The List of Scientific Journals Categorization of Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of Republic of Serbia (M24 in 2021; M23 in 2023). Beginning with No. 12 2017, AM is indexed, abstracted and covered in Clarivate Analytics service ESCI.