Socialist and Modernist Ideology in the Synthesis of Yugoslav Architecture and Art—The Case of Kockica

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i28.671

Keywords:

ideology; synthesis of art and architecture; socialist modernism; Kockica; Zagreb; Yugoslavia.

Abstract

The former Building of Socio-Political Organizations in Zagreb, now housing the Ministries of the Government of the Republic of Croatia, popularly known as Kockica, is analyzed as a case in which the synthesis of architecture and art became an aesthetic and spatial expression of socialist modernism in Yugoslavia. Designed by Ivan Vitić between 1961 and 1968, Kockica emerged within a broader cultural and political context shaped by self-managing socialism, cultural modernization, and the search for a modern representative language distinct from both the Soviet socialist realism and Western capitalist iconography. The article combines historical-interpretive analysis with an ideologically critical reading of institutional space, artistic commissions and spatial experience, reflecting the evolving social and ideological paradigms that shaped Yugoslav architecture and cultural policy during the 1960s. Its main hypothesis is that the integration of architecture, visual and applied arts, design and sculpture in Kockica should not be understood as decorative enrichment but as a regulatory and representational apparatus through which the ideology of socialist modernization was articulated spatially and sensorially. Special attention is given to the artworks integrated into the interior, regarded as constitutive elements of a visual language of modernity, progress, and cultural emancipation. Kockica appears not merely as a modernist administrative building but as a cultural and ideological artefact in which architecture and art function as a unified system of representation, while its meanings continue to be transformed in the post-Yugoslav context.

Author Biography

Tamara Koneska, Faculty of Architecture, University of Belgrade, Serbia

Tamara Koneska (1997, Skopje) is a Research and Teaching Associate and PhD candidate at the University of Belgrade—Faculty of Architecture. Her work explores how ideology, political power, and collective memory are expressed through architectural form, with a focus on (post)Yugoslav architecture. She investigates the evolving meanings of architectural and spatial palimpsests in post-socialist transitional cities and the theoretical frameworks used to critically interpret such conditions. Tamara is active in the local architectural and urban design practice and has participated in international exhibitions, competitions, and visual art projects, including the Venice Architecture Biennale, the Biennale of Stage Design in Novi Sad, and the Salons of Architecture in Belgrade and Novi Sad.

References

Altiser, Luj. Ideologija i državni ideološki aparati: beleške za istraživanje. Karpos, 2009.

Denegri, Ješa. “Inside or Outside ‘Socialist Modernism’? Radical Views on the Yugoslav Art Scene.” In Impossible Histories: Historical Avant-gardes, Neo-avant-gardes, and Post-Avant-Gardes in Yugoslavia, 1918–1991, edited by Dubravka Đurić and Miško Šuvaković. MIT Press, 2003.

Fuko, Mišel. Moć/Znanje: Odabrani spisi i razgovori 1972–1977. Mediteran Publishing, 2012.

Horvatinčić, Sanja. “Pogled iznutra o (ne)mogućoj sintezi Kockice.” ORIS 110 (2018): 134–48.

Hrastar, Tihana, and Mia Roth-Čerina. “Rooting Art-Based Interdisciplinary Practice.” Prostor 31, no. 2 (2023): 182–97. https://doi.org/10.31522/p.31.2(66).4.

Kolešnik, Ljiljana. “Prilozi interpretaciji hrvatske umjetnosti 50-ih godina. Prikaz formativne faze odnosa moderne umjetnosti i socijalističke države.” Radovi Instituta povijesti umjetnosti 29 (2005): 307–315.

Kolešnik, Ljiljana, ed. Umjetnost i ideologija: pedesete u podijeljenoj Europi. Institut za povijest umjetnosti, 2004.

Kulić, Vladimir, Maroje Mrduljaš, and Wolfgang Thaler. Modernism In-Between: The Mediatory Architectures of Socialist Yugoslavia. Jovis Verlag, 2012.

Kulić, Vladimir. “The Scope of Socialist Modernism: Architecture and State Representation in Postwar Yugoslavia.” In Sanctioning Modernism, edited by Vladimir Kulić et al. University of Texas Press, 2014.

Lefebvre, Henri. The Production of Space. Blackwell, 1991.

Mrduljaš, Maroje, and Vladimir Kulić. eds. Unfinished Modernisations: Between Utopia and Pragmatism. UHA & Arkitekturskole Aarhus, 2012.

Mrduljaš, Maroje. “Kockica.” Arhitektura 54, no. 217 (2005): 137–50.

Petrović, Branko. “Hoćemo li sintezu ili kompartmentalizam?” Čovjek i prostor 2, no. 34 (1955): 4–5.

Počanić, Patricia. “Između ideje i realizacije: umjetnička djela u interijeru Kockice.” Život umjetnosti 110 (2022): 106–29.

Počanić, Patricia. “Narudžbe i otkupi umjetničkih djela za interijere javnih institucija u Hrvatskoj 1950-ih i 1960-ih.” Peristil 62 (2019): 179–201.

Premerl, Tomislav. “Prostor i likovna sinteza.” Čovjek i prostor 12, no. 145 (1965): 3, 8.

Rancière, Jacques. The Politics of Aesthetics: The Distribution of the Sensible. Continuum, 2004.

Richter, Vjenceslav. Sinturbanizam. Mladost, 1964.

Šuvaković, Miško. “Umjetnost i ideologija.” In Umjetnost i ideologija: pedesete u podijeljenoj Europi, edited by Ljiljana Kolešnik. Institut za povijest umjetnosti, 2004.

Downloads

Published

23.10.2026

How to Cite

Koneska, T. (2026). Socialist and Modernist Ideology in the Synthesis of Yugoslav Architecture and Art—The Case of Kockica. AM Journal of Art and Media Studies, (40). https://doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i28.671

Issue

Section

MAIN TOPIC: Aesthetics Between China and Post-Yugoslav States in the Context of Globalization