Art’s Commitment to Liberation in Marcuse’s Philosophy

Authors

  • Ding Guogi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i7.86

Keywords:

Frankfurt School, Marcuse, artistic autonomy, liberation, man

Abstract

Art has a liberating function because it stands on the opposite side of a suppressed society; it is deeply connected with the public’s daily life and has an inherent characteristic of “catharsis”, like describing a good society and identifying with freedom. In the eyes of the theorists of the Frankfurt School, its form is what makes “art” art, while the autonomy of art is what realizes the transcendence and detachment of art over and from society and politics in reality by constructing a new and tangible kingdom of art. Artistic form, artistic autonomy, and the liberation of mankind are the integral parts that form art and they constitute all the elements that are needed in the art world. For as long as art exists, it will keep its commitment to truth, happiness, and liberation. This paper examines the inevitable inherent relationship between art and liberation mainly through discussing and studying Marcuse’s theories of art and aesthetics.

Author Biography

Ding Guogi

Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing
China

professor and director of Marxist Literary Theory and Criticism Research Centre, Institute of Literature

References

Adorno, Theodor W. “The Position of the Narrator in the Contemporary Novel.” In Notes to Literature (Volume One), trans. by Shierry Weber Nicholsen. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press, 2009, 30–36.

Kearney, Richard. Dialogues with Contemporary Continental Thinkers: The Phenomenological Heritage. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1984.

Kejian, Huang. “Aesthetic Self-awareness and Aesthetic Forms.” Philosophical Research 1 (2000): 52–59.

Kejian, Huang. A Personal Anthology of Huang Kejian. Guilin: Guangxi Normal University Press, 1998.

Lukes, Timonthy J. The Flight into Inwardness. Selinsgrove, Pennsylvania: Susquehanna University Press, 1985.

Marcuse, Herbert. “Art as Form of Reality.” New Left Review 74 (1972): 51–58.

Marcuse, Herbert. An Essay on Liberation. Boston: Beacon Press, 1969.

Marcuse, Herbert. Counter-revolution and Revolt. Boston: Beacon Press, 1972. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3817/0972013147

Marcuse, Herbert. Eros and Civilization: A Philosophical Inquiry into Freud. Boston: Beacon Press, 1966.

Marcuse, Herbert. Negations: Essays in Critical Theory. Boston: Beacon Press, 1968.

Marcuse, Herbert. One-dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. Boston: Be-acon Press, 1991.

Marcuse, Herbert. The Aesthetic Dimension: Towards a Critique of Marxist Aesthetics. Boston: Beacon Press, 1979.

Reitz, Charles. Art, Alienation and the Humanities. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2000.

Downloads

Published

15.04.2015

How to Cite

Guogi, D. (2015). Art’s Commitment to Liberation in Marcuse’s Philosophy. AM Journal of Art and Media Studies, (7), 30–38. https://doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i7.86