Celluloid is Not a Signifier Any More

Darko Štrajn

Abstract


Nowadays art does not necessarily need to be militant or socially involved to be political since the categories of truth and reality are destroyed through the mediatic dissipation of notions of subjectivity and objectivity. Since the first obvious indications of the inception of the times of the “end of representation” – as Deleuze pointed out half a century ago – we have to deal with a widespread awareness about the persevering change of art and of reflections about art in the social framework of institutional and technological contexts. The analysis of interactions, starting with the invention of film/cinema, artistic practice and theory, including aesthetics, highlights the importance of the notions, categories and agencies of movement. The emergence of the so-called post-media epoch signals a new decisive change following the one, which was revealed as the overwhelming onset of mass culture. As the theoretical indecision about the features of an ongoing new change seems to be still dominant, the practice of art of any conceivable variety reflects basically the same indecision. The fact that ‘film’ is still the notion, which by and large means moving images, while digitalization made the material (celluloid) film obsolete, is an elementary metaphor of the process of the vanishing of signifiers, related to the notion of art. However, in a more complex term, the questions about the correlation between form and content are re-emerging in novel configurations as well as the epistemological and ontological problems of aesthetics, concerning the designations of objects of analysis.

 

Article received: May 17, 2019; Article accepted: July 6, 2019; Published online: October 15, 2019; Original scholarly paper

How to cite this articel: Štrajn, Darko. "Celluloid is Not a Signifier Any More." AM Journal of Art and Media Studies 20 (2019): 43-50. doi: 10.25038/am.v0i20.322.


Keywords


change; digitalization; film; legibility; mass culture; movement; post-media.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adorno, Theodor, W. The Culture Industry: Selected Essays on Mass Culture. London and New York: Routledge, 2001.

Benjamin, Walter. “The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction.” In: Walter Benjamin. Illuminations. Essays and Reflections, edited by Hannah Arendt, 217–51. New York: Schocken, 1969.

Bourriaud, Nicolas. The Radicant. New York: Sternberg Press, 2009.

Deleuze, Gilles. Difference and Repetition. London and New York: Continuum, 1994.

Delorme Stéphane (2018). “Totalitarisme tech, Designing minds: changer l'humain.” Cahier du cinéma 750 (Décembre 2018): 14–16.

Steyerl, Hito. “Too Much World: Is the Internet Dead?” In: Hito Steyerl. Too Much World, edited by Nick Aikens, 30–30. Berlin: Sternberg Press, 2015.

Manovich, Lev. AI Aesthetics. Moscow: Strelka Press, 2018.

Murray, Timothy. Digital Baroque: New Media Art and Cinematic Folds. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press, 2008.

Weibel, Peter. “The Post-Media Condition” 19 March 2012. http://www.metamute.org/editorial/lab/post-media-condition, Accessed: January 6, 2019.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i20.322

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 AM Journal of Art and Media Studies

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

The content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

AM Journal of Art and Media Studies ISSN 2217-9666 - printed, ISSN 2406-1654 - online, UDK 7.01:316.774

Contact: amjournal@outlook.com

Publisher: Faculty of Media and Communications, Singidunum University, Belgrade, Serbia

Indexed in: ERIH PLUSEBSCODOAJ, and in The List of Scientific Journals Categorization of Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of Republic of Serbia (M52). Beginning with No. 12 2017, AM is indexed, abstracted and covered in Clarivate Analytics service ESCI.