No 15 (2018)

Issue No. 15, April 2018 - Main Topic: Experimental Film

From the flicker and heartbeat of silver-based film, to a bit-map grid of pixel-size slots in a digital medium, experimental film tried to subvert conventions of the medium itself and explore its properties and materials. Since the major theorists have been film-makers themselves, with incompatible views about the purposes and formal possibilities of film, and due to the fact that the majority of film theoreticians did not focus on experimental film, it comes as a minor surprise that comparing to the mainstream film, its experimental relative remained and remains theoretically overlooked and critically underexposed.

Questions about the proper location of the experimental film – is it cinema or art gallery? – or those concerning the advantages and disadvantages of its marginalized position, the existence of a proper genre, the ideological and political implication, and so on, helped to shed some light on it, nevertheless, did not result in an all-embracing interpretation, let alone an all-encompassing theory. Definitions of experimental film have always been controversial, and even more so, when they attempted to include its avant-garde or underground traits. Several interpretations follow the oppositional distinctions: non-commercial vs. commercial; non-narrative vs. narrative; formalist vs. political; abstract vs. representational; exclusion of language vs. use of language; film-as-art vs. entertainment industry, sometimes even anti-Hollywood vs. Hollywood; and so on. Such distinctions have been challenged by film-makers, who used went beyond seemingly simple dualistic interpretations in order to explore cinematic innovations and created their own idiosyncratic histories. Among them were, for instance, Vertov, Kuleshov, Dovzhenko, Epstein, Delluc, Léger, Clair, Deren, Brakhage, Markopoulos, Kubelka, Frampton, Gidal, Mulvey, but also Eisenstein, Dreyer, Bresson and Godard, but also others. Their common denominator, if there is one, is that they actually question the very possibility of a definition or a general theory.

The focus issue of the AM Journal sets to examine the evasive arena of experimental film, its history and theory, its authors and their works. With the advent of video, experimental video and video installation on the one hand, and the digital revolution that notably changed its production and reception, on the other, experimental film found itself in a situation, which differs significantly from one at beginning of 20th century and demands a closer examination. Contributions covering experimental film from different disciplinary fields are welcome and interdisciplinary approaches are encouraged.

Guest issue editor: Ernest Ženko

Table of Contents

Main Topic: Experimental Film

Miško Šuvaković
PDF
1-10
Dragana Kružić
PDF
11-22
Amra Latifić
PDF
23-33
Luka Bešlagić
PDF
35-45
Rodrigo Esteves de Lima-Lopes
PDF
47-58
Ana Došen
PDF
59-66
Ben Ogrodnik
PDF
67-82
Kristian Pandža
PDF
83-92
Aleksandra Sekulić
PDF
93-102
Boško Prostran
PDF
103-111
Kornelia Boczkowska
PDF
113-126
Ming-Yu Lee
PDF
127-134
Hugo Ljungbäck
PDF
135-146
Victor Arroyo
PDF
147-158

Beyond the Main Topic

Maurício Barros de Castro
PDF
161-172
Željko Mirković
PDF
173-184
Tanja Radošević, Goran Bulatović, Ljiljana Bulatović
PDF
185-200

Artist Portfolio

Michael Betancourt
PDF
202-208

Book Reviews

Jelisaveta Mojsilović
PDF
211-213
Marija Maglov
PDF
215-217
Tatiana Prorokova
PDF
219-221